Finale Forum: Message Boards: Wishlist
Archived Message
 |
ARCHIVES
Please note you are viewing an archive of the old board system and therefore you will not be able to reply to these messages. We have put a new board system in place and are leaving
these old messages in place for archive purposes only. There are several new features which you will all enjoy
with the new system so please visit the New Forums.
Please let us know if you have any problems with this new system.
|
|
|
Find Christian Jobs | Church Staff | Pastor Positions | pdaBlast!
Coda should consider this?
| Wishlist Board |
| Title: Coda should consider this? |
| Posted By: Damien |
| E-mail: blah@blah.com |
| Date: 11/15/2002 at 14:39:44 |
Message:This would be quite an extraordinary project, but Coda should definitely think about the possibility of somehow integrating finale with either an existing sequencing program or one they would write. For many my MIDI projects, mainly ones that I intend to have at least a partial score to, I prefer the score interface of finale to enter most of the midi data. As everyone knows, Finale is a notation program, not a sequencer, but WHY NOT? As more and more people are using sequencing programs these days, and as there do exist eclectic people such as myself who like to compose works in many styles, it makes sense that there should be a program with the sequencing/recording power of Logic Audio or Pro Tools, with the score editing power of Finale (or sibelius, or some such program).As far as I know now, it's either-or. I can use finale and get a good score and decent MIDI data, or I can use programs like Cakewalk, all of which, to my knowledge, have crappy score editors. Why not have both? Sure, it would be expensive, but so are many programs. Anyway, that's my diatribe. Anyone agree? Damien
|
| Copyright © 1995-2011 by C. M. Press, LLC. |
