Get Your Finale Output to Look Like Dorico

General notation questions, including advanced notation, formatting, etc., go here.

Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker

User avatar
N Grossingink
Posts: 1788
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:50 pm
Finale Version: 27.3
Operating System: Mac

Post by N Grossingink » Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:01 pm

Well… not quite.

For my own amusement, I wanted to try the Fravura music font, the Finale-compatible version of Dorico's Bravura. I was very impressed. The dynamics and articulations are much nicer, to my eye, than Maestro. Overall, the font is very pleasing.

While I was at it, I wondered if it would be possible to make a faux Dorico file in Finale format. I've attached a zip file containing 2 files, set up with the Fravura music font as default. One file is set up with the "Academico" text font - you'll have this if you've downloaded the Dorico demo - it's Dorico's default text font. The other uses the Finale standard text font Times New Roman. The Fravura font is a free download available here:

http://musegraph.com/fravura-font-free/

The folks at Musegraph, no doubt in order to show us how technically ahead of the curve they are, have used a non-standard archiver to archive/unpack the font files that you download. Go ahead and download the "B1.org" archiver and install it. It works for me with no side effects that I can see.

The only aspect of Dorico's output that I did not try to replicate was the slur and tie contours which have poor settings as a default (contour is too flat; tips are too hooked). I've included more natural looking slurs and ties. A colleague of mine has purchased Dorico and assures me that Dorico's slurs and ties are adjustable in the document settings and better settings give excellent results.

Just thought some might be interested…

N.
Attachments
FravuraTemplates.zip
(169.25 KiB) Downloaded 232 times
N. Grossingink
Educational Band, Orchestra and Jazz Ensemble a specialty
Sample: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pFF5OeJDeLFGHMRyXrubFqZWXBubErw4/view?usp=share_link


Mac Mini 2014 2.6 Ghz, 8Gb RAM
OSX 10.15.7
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.3, 27.3


Knut
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:33 pm
Finale Version: Finale 25
Operating System: Mac

Post by Knut » Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:18 pm

N Grossingink wrote:The only aspect of Dorico's output that I did not try to replicate was the slur and tie contours which have poor settings as a default (contour is too flat; tips are too hooked). I've included more natural looking slurs and ties. A colleague of mine has purchased Dorico and assures me that Dorico's slurs and ties are adjustable in the document settings and better settings give excellent results.
Dorico's slurs are indeed customizable, and better settings do give better results than the default. However, I think it's important to note that Dorico draws it's core slur shapes quite differently from Finale, and in my personal opinion, however much you tweak the slur settings in dorico you won't ever get slurs as nice as what Finale can achieve. If you want special shapes like flat or multi-segment slurs, Dorico does have the clear upper hand, but the core shape is much nicer in Finale.

BuonTempi
Posts: 1307
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:59 am
Finale Version: Finale 27
Operating System: Mac

Post by BuonTempi » Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:05 pm

Getting Finale to behave Like Dorico is one thing: getting Dorico to look like Finale is another! I've got pretty similar output in both programs for a few simple pieces, and I think each program (and the results) has good points and bad points.

User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 827
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:41 am
Finale Version: Finale 25.5
Operating System: Mac

Post by John Ruggero » Mon Mar 13, 2017 2:17 pm

I will only switch to Dorico if I can make it look like Finale, which will require a SMuFL Maestro font. I am not holding my breath for a SMuFL Maestro font.
2020 M1 Mac mini (OS 12.6) Finale 25.5, Dorico, Affinity Publisher, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard Maestro
www.cantilenapress.com

"The better the composer, the better the notation."

Knut
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:33 pm
Finale Version: Finale 25
Operating System: Mac

Post by Knut » Mon Mar 13, 2017 2:30 pm

John Ruggero wrote:I will only switch to Dorico if I can make it look like Finale, which will require a SMuFL Maestro font. I am not holding my breath for a SMuFL Maestro font.
Actually, MakeMusic, or more precisely, Mark Adler, is already working on this as a prerequisite for SMuFL support in Finale.

BuonTempi
Posts: 1307
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:59 am
Finale Version: Finale 27
Operating System: Mac

Post by BuonTempi » Mon Mar 13, 2017 2:47 pm

Yes, MM have been heavily involved in the SMuFL standard, with the intention of implementing it within Finale.

I'm now only purchasing fonts that can be used in both Dorico and Finale, e.g. November, MTF Cadence, etc.

User avatar
MikeHalloran
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2017 2:56 am
Finale Version: 27
Operating System: Mac

Post by MikeHalloran » Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:05 pm

Thanks for that. Looks interesting.
Mike Halloran

Finale 27.4.1, SmartScore X2 Pro, GPO5 & World Instruments
MacOS Ventura 14.5 (public beta); 2023 Studio M2 Ultra, 192G RAM, 8TB; 2021 MBAir M1
NotePerformer4, Dorico 5, Overture, Notion 6, DP 11, Logic Pro

Post Reply