secondary beam angle tool and mid-beam stem lengths
Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:28 am
- Finale Version: 27.2.0.142
- Operating System: Mac
Hello colleagues,
Starting point: sixteenth note tuplet group with some cross staffing. I created a secondary beam angle that tapers at one end. But the mid-beam stems show outside the beams (fig. A).
When I lower the flawed stems with the beam stem adjust tool, the stems drop to create a space below the beam, leaving a tiny "stemlet" in the middle of the beam that still shows above the beam (fig. B).
It would seem that the beam stem adjust tool is not useful in this case. How can those "stemlets" be adjusted so they are not visible outside the tapered beam?
Rebecca
Starting point: sixteenth note tuplet group with some cross staffing. I created a secondary beam angle that tapers at one end. But the mid-beam stems show outside the beams (fig. A).
When I lower the flawed stems with the beam stem adjust tool, the stems drop to create a space below the beam, leaving a tiny "stemlet" in the middle of the beam that still shows above the beam (fig. B).
It would seem that the beam stem adjust tool is not useful in this case. How can those "stemlets" be adjusted so they are not visible outside the tapered beam?
Rebecca
iMac (2017) 3.6 GHz Intel Core i7, 16 GB 2400 MHz DDR34, OS 10.14.6;
Finale 27.2.0.142; Cubase Pro 12; GPO, JABB, C&MB; several EW libraries;
Roland A88, Estonia L210.
Finale 27.2.0.142; Cubase Pro 12; GPO, JABB, C&MB; several EW libraries;
Roland A88, Estonia L210.
- Peter Thomsen
- Posts: 6646
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 6:47 pm
- Finale Version: Finale v27.4
- Operating System: Mac
This is a well known problem with cross-staff notes in combination with feathered beaming.
It can only be solved via a workaround.
See the attached PDF files for two solutions.
It can only be solved via a workaround.
See the attached PDF files for two solutions.
Mac OS X 12.6.9 (Monterey), Finale user since 1996
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:28 am
- Finale Version: 27.2.0.142
- Operating System: Mac
Thanks, Peter! This is very helpful.
Rebecca
Rebecca
iMac (2017) 3.6 GHz Intel Core i7, 16 GB 2400 MHz DDR34, OS 10.14.6;
Finale 27.2.0.142; Cubase Pro 12; GPO, JABB, C&MB; several EW libraries;
Roland A88, Estonia L210.
Finale 27.2.0.142; Cubase Pro 12; GPO, JABB, C&MB; several EW libraries;
Roland A88, Estonia L210.
-
- Posts: 765
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:34 am
- Finale Version: Finale 26, 27.4.1
- Operating System: Windows
If you haven't too many of these, or if they aren't as complicated as in Peter's examples, this might be a simple workaround:
Create the group as eighths, use the tuplet tool if necessary (fx 7 eighths in the place of 2), create the secondary beam as a shape expression. The beauty of this solution is that it's simple, the disadvantage may be that the length of the shape expression has to be adjusted if the the width of the motive is altered.
Create the group as eighths, use the tuplet tool if necessary (fx 7 eighths in the place of 2), create the secondary beam as a shape expression. The beauty of this solution is that it's simple, the disadvantage may be that the length of the shape expression has to be adjusted if the the width of the motive is altered.
Last edited by Anders Hedelin on Sat Apr 25, 2020 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Finale 26.3, 27.4.1
Windows 10
Windows 10
- zuill
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:35 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 2011-v26.3.1
- Operating System: Windows
I remembered working with this years ago. Here's an article that Robert Puff wrote:
https://www.rpmseattle.com/of_note/fina ... -notation/
Zuill
https://www.rpmseattle.com/of_note/fina ... -notation/
Zuill
Windows 10, Finale 2011-v26.3.1
"When all is said and done, more is said than done."
"When all is said and done, more is said than done."
-
- Posts: 765
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:34 am
- Finale Version: Finale 26, 27.4.1
- Operating System: Windows
Could this possibly achieve the same result with fewer steps?
Finale 26.3, 27.4.1
Windows 10
Windows 10
- N Grossingink
- Posts: 1790
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:50 pm
- Finale Version: 27.3
- Operating System: Mac
3 beams collapsing to one means a slowdown. One beam sprouting to 3 a speedup. In my opinion, this kind of notation should be used for a solo instrument only. In an ensemble it seems to lose its identity simply because there is other stuff going on to grab the listener's attention. It's mainly used as a "shock value" effect.
N. Grossingink
Educational Band, Orchestra and Jazz Ensemble a specialty
Sample: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pFF5OeJDeLFGHMRyXrubFqZWXBubErw4/view?usp=share_link
Mac Mini 2014 2.6 Ghz, 8Gb RAM
OSX 10.15.7
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.3, 27.3
Educational Band, Orchestra and Jazz Ensemble a specialty
Sample: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pFF5OeJDeLFGHMRyXrubFqZWXBubErw4/view?usp=share_link
Mac Mini 2014 2.6 Ghz, 8Gb RAM
OSX 10.15.7
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.3, 27.3
-
- Posts: 765
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:34 am
- Finale Version: Finale 26, 27.4.1
- Operating System: Windows
It's also used in ensembles to indicate an accelerando/ritardando in one part, independent of the others.N Grossingink wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 6:55 pmIn my opinion, this kind of notation should be used for a solo instrument only. In an ensemble it seems to lose its identity simply because there is other stuff going on to grab the listener's attention. It's mainly used as a "shock value" effect.
Finale 26.3, 27.4.1
Windows 10
Windows 10