secondary beam angle tool and mid-beam stem lengths

General notation questions, including advanced notation, formatting, etc., go here.

Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker

Rebecca Oswald
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:28 am
Finale Version: 27.2.0.142
Operating System: Mac

Post by Rebecca Oswald » Thu Apr 23, 2020 6:25 pm

Hello colleagues,

Starting point: sixteenth note tuplet group with some cross staffing. I created a secondary beam angle that tapers at one end. But the mid-beam stems show outside the beams (fig. A).
fig. A.png
When I lower the flawed stems with the beam stem adjust tool, the stems drop to create a space below the beam, leaving a tiny "stemlet" in the middle of the beam that still shows above the beam (fig. B).
fig. B.png
It would seem that the beam stem adjust tool is not useful in this case. How can those "stemlets" be adjusted so they are not visible outside the tapered beam?

Rebecca
iMac (2017) 3.6 GHz Intel Core i7, 16 GB 2400 MHz DDR34, OS 10.14.6;
Finale 27.2.0.142; Cubase Pro 12; GPO, JABB, C&MB; several EW libraries;
Roland A88, Estonia L210.


User avatar
Peter Thomsen
Posts: 6646
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 6:47 pm
Finale Version: Finale v27.4
Operating System: Mac

Post by Peter Thomsen » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:58 pm

This is a well known problem with cross-staff notes in combination with feathered beaming.

It can only be solved via a workaround.

See the attached PDF files for two solutions.

Cross-StaffFeatheredBeams1.pdf.zip
Cross-StaffFeatheredBeams2.pdf.zip
Mac OS X 12.6.9 (Monterey), Finale user since 1996

Rebecca Oswald
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:28 am
Finale Version: 27.2.0.142
Operating System: Mac

Post by Rebecca Oswald » Fri Apr 24, 2020 1:43 am

Thanks, Peter! This is very helpful.

Rebecca
iMac (2017) 3.6 GHz Intel Core i7, 16 GB 2400 MHz DDR34, OS 10.14.6;
Finale 27.2.0.142; Cubase Pro 12; GPO, JABB, C&MB; several EW libraries;
Roland A88, Estonia L210.

Anders Hedelin
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:34 am
Finale Version: Finale 26, 27.4.1
Operating System: Windows

Post by Anders Hedelin » Fri Apr 24, 2020 7:47 am

If you haven't too many of these, or if they aren't as complicated as in Peter's examples, this might be a simple workaround:
Create the group as eighths, use the tuplet tool if necessary (fx 7 eighths in the place of 2), create the secondary beam as a shape expression.
Cross-staff feathered beam.PNG
The beauty of this solution is that it's simple, the disadvantage may be that the length of the shape expression has to be adjusted if the the width of the motive is altered.
Last edited by Anders Hedelin on Sat Apr 25, 2020 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Finale 26.3, 27.4.1
Windows 10

User avatar
zuill
Posts: 4418
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:35 pm
Finale Version: Finale 2011-v26.3.1
Operating System: Windows

Post by zuill » Sat Apr 25, 2020 3:57 pm

I remembered working with this years ago. Here's an article that Robert Puff wrote:

https://www.rpmseattle.com/of_note/fina ... -notation/

Zuill
Windows 10, Finale 2011-v26.3.1
"When all is said and done, more is said than done."

Anders Hedelin
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:34 am
Finale Version: Finale 26, 27.4.1
Operating System: Windows

Post by Anders Hedelin » Sat Apr 25, 2020 6:27 pm

Could this possibly achieve the same result with fewer steps?
Cross-staff feathered beam 2.PNG
Finale 26.3, 27.4.1
Windows 10

User avatar
miker
Posts: 6025
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:28 pm
Finale Version: Finale 27.4
Operating System: Mac

Post by miker » Sat Apr 25, 2020 6:41 pm

What does the feathered beam indicate? Is it a speedup or slowdown in tempo of the beamed group?
Finale 27 | SmartScorePro 64
Mac OS 13.2.1 Ventura
Copyist for Barbershop Harmony Society

User avatar
N Grossingink
Posts: 1790
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:50 pm
Finale Version: 27.3
Operating System: Mac

Post by N Grossingink » Sat Apr 25, 2020 6:55 pm

miker wrote:
Sat Apr 25, 2020 6:41 pm
What does the feathered beam indicate? Is it a speedup or slowdown in tempo of the beamed group?
3 beams collapsing to one means a slowdown. One beam sprouting to 3 a speedup. In my opinion, this kind of notation should be used for a solo instrument only. In an ensemble it seems to lose its identity simply because there is other stuff going on to grab the listener's attention. It's mainly used as a "shock value" effect.
N. Grossingink
Educational Band, Orchestra and Jazz Ensemble a specialty
Sample: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pFF5OeJDeLFGHMRyXrubFqZWXBubErw4/view?usp=share_link


Mac Mini 2014 2.6 Ghz, 8Gb RAM
OSX 10.15.7
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.3, 27.3

Anders Hedelin
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:34 am
Finale Version: Finale 26, 27.4.1
Operating System: Windows

Post by Anders Hedelin » Sat Apr 25, 2020 7:47 pm

N Grossingink wrote:
Sat Apr 25, 2020 6:55 pm
In my opinion, this kind of notation should be used for a solo instrument only. In an ensemble it seems to lose its identity simply because there is other stuff going on to grab the listener's attention. It's mainly used as a "shock value" effect.
It's also used in ensembles to indicate an accelerando/ritardando in one part, independent of the others.
Finale 26.3, 27.4.1
Windows 10

Post Reply