O/T? layout for a particular concerto

General notation questions, including advanced notation, formatting, etc., go here.

Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker

User avatar
Michel R E
Posts: 702
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:16 pm
Finale Version: Finale 2012, 25, 26
Operating System: Windows

Post by Michel R E » Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:14 pm

I'm wondering how to approach the layout for a work I've been commissioned to write.

It's a concerto for string quartet and string orchestra.

My first reaction would be to have the quartet as one unit, above the string section.

But then I'm thinking that the members of the string quartet are also the 1st desks of this particular string orchestra, and will, at some points, be joining their respective sections.

Any suggestions?
User of Finale since version 3.0 on Windows.
Now using a mix of Finale 2012, Finale 25, and 26.1
GPO, Garritan Solo Stradivari violin, Gofriller Solo Cello.
XSamples Chamber Ensemble.
Absolute convert to NotePerformer3.


User avatar
MikeHalloran
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2017 2:56 am
Finale Version: 27
Operating System: Mac

Post by MikeHalloran » Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:32 pm

Michel R E wrote:I'm wondering how to approach the layout for a work I've been commissioned to write.

It's a concerto for string quartet and string orchestra.

My first reaction would be to have the quartet as one unit, above the string section.

But then I'm thinking that the members of the string quartet are also the 1st desks of this particular string orchestra, and will, at some points, be joining their respective sections.

Any suggestions?
It depends. Normally, this is pretty straightforward. The score is written out as you think it should be. The ensemble parts would have soloist cues as needed. You don’t have to include the entire lines. Multi-measure rests are fine.

Since the soloists are also part of the ensemble, just mark the parts Solo and Tutti as appropriate.

Are the soloists really expected to be part of the ensemble? If not, I would mark the solo lines the same but would mark Ens. Instead of Tutti and make those notes cues.
Mike Halloran

Finale 27.4.1, SmartScore X2 Pro, GPO5 & World Instruments
MacOS Ventura 14.5 (public beta); 2023 Studio M2 Ultra, 192G RAM, 8TB; 2021 MBAir M1
NotePerformer4, Dorico 5, Overture, Notion 6, DP 11, Logic Pro

Ere Lievonen
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:16 pm
Finale Version: Finale 2010b
Operating System: Windows

Post by Ere Lievonen » Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:41 pm

My idea would be: if the solo quartet players are going to be sitting in the regular positions of section leaders - and sitting next to a desk partner like a regular section leader would - then the soloists' staves should be grouped with the other string groups. If this is not the case, i.e. the solo quartet players are each sitting alone (even if in front of their respective string sections), their staves should be grouped together as a quartet.
Finale 2010b. Finale user since 1994.
Windows 7 & Mac OS X 10.9.5

User avatar
motet
Posts: 8265
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
Operating System: Windows

Post by motet » Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:42 pm

Interesting dilemma. I guess if the quartet plays together like a string quartet much of the time, I would keep them separate as a unit.

Here's an aria from a Mozart Opera with wind and string obligato parts that are placed together above the section strings. (This is an older edition but the new Barenreiter Neue Mozart Ausgabe does it the same way.)

mknoll
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:08 pm
Finale Version: 2014, 2014.5, 25
Operating System: Mac

Post by mknoll » Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:44 pm

Elgar wrote a piece with the same scoring. Not sure if your approach would/should be the same, but it might give you some ideas. The score is at IMSLP. Just search for Introduction and Allegro, Op. 47 (can't post the direct URL).

User avatar
Michel R E
Posts: 702
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:16 pm
Finale Version: Finale 2012, 25, 26
Operating System: Windows

Post by Michel R E » Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:52 pm

Thank-you for all the thoughtful replies.

I am suspecting that the "Elgar" approach would probably be best.. I hadn't thought when I posted my question, but there will be extensive divisi in the orchestra parts. keeping the solo quartet separate on the page will probably make things easier.

again, thank-you all for the suggestions.

michel
User of Finale since version 3.0 on Windows.
Now using a mix of Finale 2012, Finale 25, and 26.1
GPO, Garritan Solo Stradivari violin, Gofriller Solo Cello.
XSamples Chamber Ensemble.
Absolute convert to NotePerformer3.

Post Reply