Dorico, Finale, and crystal balls
Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker
- dankreider
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:14 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 25.5
- Operating System: Windows
I've used Finale daily since 1999. I know it well for what I do - standard sorts of stuff, and sometimes some engraving nuances. Like most of you, I have hotkeys, custom libraries, and lots of templates that I've amassed over the past (almost) 20 years. I don't have any major complaints. Finale works fine for me.
I'll keep it short. Two questions:
1. What are these systemic problems with MM that I hear people alluding to? I see them popping up frequently and it's troubling. Is MM in decline? Hunches are ok, but data would be better, if anyone has it to share. Will Finale still be around in 10 years—and not only around, but continually improved and updated? What's going on with the company? Or is this just par for the course: forums being the place to voice complaints?
2. Is there compelling reason to invest hundreds of hours (and dollars) to learn Dorico? Many of us on this forum use Finale as our livelihood. Workflow matters and deadlines are real. A change of this magnitude would have a massive impact on my efficiency for the foreseeable future. Not to mention the hundreds of projects that reside exclusively in Finale... and perhaps most importantly, we have to speak the language of the larger music industry. Is Dorico that much better—not just slick and different, but truly superior enough to warrant the plunge? I'm speaking as a professional, not a hobbyist (I'm speaking of vocation, not skill. Many hobbyists on this forum are far better in Finale than I am!).
I'm willing to take a long-term view, but I just don't have enough data. Anyone?
Thanks!
I'll keep it short. Two questions:
1. What are these systemic problems with MM that I hear people alluding to? I see them popping up frequently and it's troubling. Is MM in decline? Hunches are ok, but data would be better, if anyone has it to share. Will Finale still be around in 10 years—and not only around, but continually improved and updated? What's going on with the company? Or is this just par for the course: forums being the place to voice complaints?
2. Is there compelling reason to invest hundreds of hours (and dollars) to learn Dorico? Many of us on this forum use Finale as our livelihood. Workflow matters and deadlines are real. A change of this magnitude would have a massive impact on my efficiency for the foreseeable future. Not to mention the hundreds of projects that reside exclusively in Finale... and perhaps most importantly, we have to speak the language of the larger music industry. Is Dorico that much better—not just slick and different, but truly superior enough to warrant the plunge? I'm speaking as a professional, not a hobbyist (I'm speaking of vocation, not skill. Many hobbyists on this forum are far better in Finale than I am!).
I'm willing to take a long-term view, but I just don't have enough data. Anyone?
Thanks!
Finale 25.5
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us
- miker
- Posts: 6012
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:28 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 27.4
- Operating System: Mac
Many of us are very close to, or already on the far side of 70 years old. Speaking for myself, I'm not too concerned that Finale may not be here in 10 or 15 years. I probably won't be, either. (All respect and props to David Ward!)
I'm not denigrating your concern. It's certainly a valid one. But it's one of those questions with no answer. Finale could close down tomorrow. Daniel Spreadbury could be hit by a truck. Sibelius could be sold to a conglomerate that doesn't care.
My own advice would be to stay with what you know, until - and unless - you are forced to make a change.
I'm not denigrating your concern. It's certainly a valid one. But it's one of those questions with no answer. Finale could close down tomorrow. Daniel Spreadbury could be hit by a truck. Sibelius could be sold to a conglomerate that doesn't care.
My own advice would be to stay with what you know, until - and unless - you are forced to make a change.
Finale 27 | SmartScorePro 64
Mac OS 13.2.1 Ventura
Copyist for Barbershop Harmony Society
Mac OS 13.2.1 Ventura
Copyist for Barbershop Harmony Society
- FwL
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2017 10:53 pm
- Finale Version: 2010, 25.5
- Operating System: Windows
dankreider wrote:What are these systemic problems with MM that I hear people alluding to?
Layer collisions is a huge issue for me. I notate a lot of guitar music. I stopped upgrading after 2010, but finally upgraded to 25.5 based on them finally fixing one issue with accidentals in layers.
A composer is a guy who goes around forcing his will on unsuspecting air molecules... often with the aid of unsuspecting musicians - Frank Zappa
- dankreider
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:14 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 25.5
- Operating System: Windows
@miker: I'm 36!
Your point is well-taken. To be honest, I'm getting tired of all the micro-tweaks in Finale. Usable orchestral scores for my players require sometimes an hour of manual adjustments. I'm tempted.
Your point is well-taken. To be honest, I'm getting tired of all the micro-tweaks in Finale. Usable orchestral scores for my players require sometimes an hour of manual adjustments. I'm tempted.
Finale 25.5
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us
- David Ward
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:48 pm
- Finale Version: F 25.5 & 26.3
- Operating System: Mac
miker wrote:… … …(All respect and props to David Ward!)… … …
Finale 25.5 & 26.3
Mac 10.13.6 & 10.14.6
Mac 10.13.6 & 10.14.6
- MikeHalloran
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2017 2:56 am
- Finale Version: 27
- Operating System: Mac
Does Dorico support MusicXML 3.0 or 3.1 and how good is the import?
For years, I did note entry in Encore and exported anything important to Finale where I could add lyrics and tweak to my heart's content. Large scores were begun in Finale.
If the xml export from Finale / import to Dorico is decent, then that may be the best of both worlds once Dorico is ready.
Nowadays, I'm using SmartScore X2 Pro to scan those Encore files into xml 3.0 as it picks up the lyrics quite well.
For years, I did note entry in Encore and exported anything important to Finale where I could add lyrics and tweak to my heart's content. Large scores were begun in Finale.
If the xml export from Finale / import to Dorico is decent, then that may be the best of both worlds once Dorico is ready.
Nowadays, I'm using SmartScore X2 Pro to scan those Encore files into xml 3.0 as it picks up the lyrics quite well.
Mike Halloran
Finale 27.4.1, SmartScore X2 Pro, GPO5 & World Instruments
MacOS Ventura 14.5 (public beta); 2023 Studio M2 Ultra, 192G RAM, 8TB; 2021 MBAir M1
NotePerformer4, Dorico 5, Overture, Notion 6, DP 11, Logic Pro
Finale 27.4.1, SmartScore X2 Pro, GPO5 & World Instruments
MacOS Ventura 14.5 (public beta); 2023 Studio M2 Ultra, 192G RAM, 8TB; 2021 MBAir M1
NotePerformer4, Dorico 5, Overture, Notion 6, DP 11, Logic Pro
I exported a large orchestral score including voices and lyrics from Finale 2014.5 (perfectly tweaked and formatted, at least to my taste and preferences - large time signatures, no key signatures, etc.) via XML (don't know what version that would be, though) to Dorico 2 Pro. All the musical information seems to be there (notes, articulations, expressions, smart shapes, lyrics, but no text blocks). Looking at it in Galley (= Scroll) View it's all quite readable, but lyrics appear sometimes in strange (vertical) positions , courtesy accidentals are added or removed (because it apparently thinks it's in a C key signature), fonts and some formatting preferences are changed (rehearsal marks, tempo indications, measure numbers, etc.).Does Dorico support MusicXML 3.0 or 3.1 and how good is the import?
Once you go to Page View, however, your real work begins .... Everything needs to be re-formatted to your liking, such as page formats, fonts, page sizes, etc. and playback has to be completely re-tweaked (because it is automatically loaded into their HALion VST instrument), and every action (e.g. switching from Galley to Page View) is exceedingly slow (at least on my system, although no problem whatsoever when doing the same using Finale).
I've followed the Dorico development with great interest since it began (certainly seemed like a good idea to re-design something from the ground up) and even (stupidly ... so far a total waste of money) bought it, but, as many have already said, if you have a developed personal workflow and knowledge of Finale, there is at this point no reason to switch to Dorico. Maybe some day, in the future ... (and/or if you start using a notation program for the first time and have the patience to wait for their updates to implement what often are even extremely basic features).
Finale 3.7 > 27.4.1, GPO5, ASUS laptop, 18.4'' display, Intel Core i7, 32GB RAM, WIN 10 Pro, Cubase
- MikeHalloran
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2017 2:56 am
- Finale Version: 27
- Operating System: Mac
I wonder if MuicXML 3.1 would give you better results — or did you use it?
Finale 2014.5 defaults to MusicXML 3.0 unless you download and install the free Dolet 7 plug-in.
https://www.musicxml.com/dolet-plugin/d ... or-finale/
25.4 and later defaults to xml 3.1 with options for backwards compatibility.
If Dorico isn’t supporting 3.1 yet, why not? It’s not as if Mr. Spreadbury isn’t aware of it.
Finale 2014.5 defaults to MusicXML 3.0 unless you download and install the free Dolet 7 plug-in.
https://www.musicxml.com/dolet-plugin/d ... or-finale/
25.4 and later defaults to xml 3.1 with options for backwards compatibility.
If Dorico isn’t supporting 3.1 yet, why not? It’s not as if Mr. Spreadbury isn’t aware of it.
Mike Halloran
Finale 27.4.1, SmartScore X2 Pro, GPO5 & World Instruments
MacOS Ventura 14.5 (public beta); 2023 Studio M2 Ultra, 192G RAM, 8TB; 2021 MBAir M1
NotePerformer4, Dorico 5, Overture, Notion 6, DP 11, Logic Pro
Finale 27.4.1, SmartScore X2 Pro, GPO5 & World Instruments
MacOS Ventura 14.5 (public beta); 2023 Studio M2 Ultra, 192G RAM, 8TB; 2021 MBAir M1
NotePerformer4, Dorico 5, Overture, Notion 6, DP 11, Logic Pro
Wasn't aware that there was a new Dolet version. Downloaded, installed version 3.1 now, but the XML export to Dorico gives the same results.
See here what he has to say about that: https://www.steinberg.net/forums/viewto ... on#p754690It’s not as if Mr. Spreadbury isn’t aware of it.
Finale 3.7 > 27.4.1, GPO5, ASUS laptop, 18.4'' display, Intel Core i7, 32GB RAM, WIN 10 Pro, Cubase
- MikeHalloran
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2017 2:56 am
- Finale Version: 27
- Operating System: Mac
OK, that was January. A New! and Improved! version has been released since then. I was just wondering.
Perhaps, I'll test it myself this week.
Perhaps, I'll test it myself this week.
Mike Halloran
Finale 27.4.1, SmartScore X2 Pro, GPO5 & World Instruments
MacOS Ventura 14.5 (public beta); 2023 Studio M2 Ultra, 192G RAM, 8TB; 2021 MBAir M1
NotePerformer4, Dorico 5, Overture, Notion 6, DP 11, Logic Pro
Finale 27.4.1, SmartScore X2 Pro, GPO5 & World Instruments
MacOS Ventura 14.5 (public beta); 2023 Studio M2 Ultra, 192G RAM, 8TB; 2021 MBAir M1
NotePerformer4, Dorico 5, Overture, Notion 6, DP 11, Logic Pro
- dankreider
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:14 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 25.5
- Operating System: Windows
Somewhat. But my approach to Dorico has been not to say, "What don't I like about Finale," but rather, "What can Dorico do?"mmike wrote:if you have a developed personal workflow and knowledge of Finale, there is at this point no reason to switch to Dorico. Maybe some day, in the future ... (and/or if you start using a notation program for the first time and have the patience to wait for their updates to implement what often are even extremely basic features).
That has led me to things like this, which are astoundingly helpful for my work. Gamechanger. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kivzO7z4j4Y&t=5s
Not to mention piano fingerings, automatic articulation collision, pedal markings...
The only lacking feature that I am personally inconvenienced by is manual lyric baseline adjustment, which I've been told is next on the list. So I agree about Dorico being a work in progress. But it's already so compelling for me.
Finale 25.5
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us
- dankreider
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:14 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 25.5
- Operating System: Windows
I'll also add that I've logged about 5 or six hours over the past week watching and re-watching the tutorials, pencil in hand. I just started to jump in to actually scoring yesterday. I'm happy to say that, after 20 years in Finale, this is a surprisingly easy switch. Dorico is making sense to me more quickly than I thought it would.
There are missing features, yes. And a couple keystroke changes I'm having to relearn ("6" is now a quarter note! Arg!). But I can already see the payoff. A month or so and I'll be faster than I was in Finale. Gone are the days of hours of score tweaking, at least for me.
To be honest, many of the tweaks I was so proud of having learned in Finale are no longer necessary.
Not trying to be a Dorico evangelist here. I continue to deeply appreciate Finale and will keep using it as needed. Just thrilled at the new third option besides Finale and Sibelius (sorry, Lilypond, Musescore, et al!).
-Dan
There are missing features, yes. And a couple keystroke changes I'm having to relearn ("6" is now a quarter note! Arg!). But I can already see the payoff. A month or so and I'll be faster than I was in Finale. Gone are the days of hours of score tweaking, at least for me.
To be honest, many of the tweaks I was so proud of having learned in Finale are no longer necessary.
Not trying to be a Dorico evangelist here. I continue to deeply appreciate Finale and will keep using it as needed. Just thrilled at the new third option besides Finale and Sibelius (sorry, Lilypond, Musescore, et al!).
-Dan
Finale 25.5
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us
I finally bought Dorico when 2.0 came out. I've spent a bunch of hours over the last week starting to learn it.
Finale is fine, and I can do everything I need in it. But formatting a large orchestral opera score, and all of the parts, was so, so much work. Finale lets you customize absolutely everything, but does very little pure formatting for you.
And for those of us who are also concerned with Playback, Finale's system is an odd mix of powerful and archaic. You can achieve much, but it's incredibly taxing. With Dorico's controller automation view, and ability to customize playback events without affecting the score - AND (and this is huge) the possibility of assigning different expression maps to EVERY instrument, Finale is left very much in the dust.
There are things Dorico still can't do. It can't do Swing feel in playback, for instance, which is crazy. And though it's instituted a powerful divisi system, you still can't use it in reverse (i.e. you can't have a wind part go between one and two staves in the score, but generate two separate parts).
But. My sense after several days playing around with Dorico is that, even if it is not as fully functional as finale, it is MUCH better - programmed by musicians, with a simpler, more elegant workflow that will ultimately more than pay back the time I invest to learn it.
I have used Finale since 1993 (version 2.0 for Windows - omg what a disaster that was!!!) I have been skeptical and hesitant about Dorico, but their latest release has me pretty much convinced, and I think I'm using this summer to learn the thing, and possibly never writing another piece in Finale. I have faith that the things I need Dorico to implement, they'll do. (unlike the handful of finale pains that have NEVER been corrected!)
Finale is fine, and I can do everything I need in it. But formatting a large orchestral opera score, and all of the parts, was so, so much work. Finale lets you customize absolutely everything, but does very little pure formatting for you.
And for those of us who are also concerned with Playback, Finale's system is an odd mix of powerful and archaic. You can achieve much, but it's incredibly taxing. With Dorico's controller automation view, and ability to customize playback events without affecting the score - AND (and this is huge) the possibility of assigning different expression maps to EVERY instrument, Finale is left very much in the dust.
There are things Dorico still can't do. It can't do Swing feel in playback, for instance, which is crazy. And though it's instituted a powerful divisi system, you still can't use it in reverse (i.e. you can't have a wind part go between one and two staves in the score, but generate two separate parts).
But. My sense after several days playing around with Dorico is that, even if it is not as fully functional as finale, it is MUCH better - programmed by musicians, with a simpler, more elegant workflow that will ultimately more than pay back the time I invest to learn it.
I have used Finale since 1993 (version 2.0 for Windows - omg what a disaster that was!!!) I have been skeptical and hesitant about Dorico, but their latest release has me pretty much convinced, and I think I'm using this summer to learn the thing, and possibly never writing another piece in Finale. I have faith that the things I need Dorico to implement, they'll do. (unlike the handful of finale pains that have NEVER been corrected!)
Dan Sonenberg
www.danielsonenberg.org
Finale 25.5
iMac Retina 5k, 27-inch, 2017. 32gb ram, and OSX 10.13.6 and MacBook pro 2018, 13", 2.7GHz Intel Core i7, 16gb ram, OSX 10.13.6
Vienna Ensemble Pro, Logic X, and lotsa samples
www.danielsonenberg.org
Finale 25.5
iMac Retina 5k, 27-inch, 2017. 32gb ram, and OSX 10.13.6 and MacBook pro 2018, 13", 2.7GHz Intel Core i7, 16gb ram, OSX 10.13.6
Vienna Ensemble Pro, Logic X, and lotsa samples
- David Ward
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:48 pm
- Finale Version: F 25.5 & 26.3
- Operating System: Mac
Oh bu***r! I'm beginning to feel I may have to learn Dorico, although I don't much want to.shnootre wrote:… … … … I have faith that the things I need Dorico to implement, they'll do. (unlike the handful of finale pains that have NEVER been corrected!)
If they were to get rid of that silly dongle thing…
Finale 25.5 & 26.3
Mac 10.13.6 & 10.14.6
Mac 10.13.6 & 10.14.6
Dorico doesn't use a USB dongle, but a Soft-eLicenser (with a virtual license container on your hard disk)If they were to get rid of that silly dongle thing…
that, at least, isn't a problem, although I could certainly think of a few others ....
Finale 3.7 > 27.4.1, GPO5, ASUS laptop, 18.4'' display, Intel Core i7, 32GB RAM, WIN 10 Pro, Cubase
- N Grossingink
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:50 pm
- Finale Version: 27.3
- Operating System: Mac
It's my understanding that Dorico does use a dongle, in lieu of the Soft-eLicenser. Have I got this wrong?mmike wrote:Dorico doesn't use a USB dongle, but a Soft-eLicenser (with a virtual license container on your hard disk)If they were to get rid of that silly dongle thing…
that, at least, isn't a problem, although I could certainly think of a few others ....
N.
N. Grossingink
Educational Band, Orchestra and Jazz Ensemble a specialty
Sample: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pFF5OeJDeLFGHMRyXrubFqZWXBubErw4/view?usp=share_link
Mac Mini 2014 2.6 Ghz, 8Gb RAM
OSX 10.15.7
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.3, 27.3
Educational Band, Orchestra and Jazz Ensemble a specialty
Sample: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pFF5OeJDeLFGHMRyXrubFqZWXBubErw4/view?usp=share_link
Mac Mini 2014 2.6 Ghz, 8Gb RAM
OSX 10.15.7
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.3, 27.3
yes
it installs and works without a dongle. there is some need for a dongle in certain situations, see https://www.steinberg.net/forums/viewto ... 45#p546959 for all details
it installs and works without a dongle. there is some need for a dongle in certain situations, see https://www.steinberg.net/forums/viewto ... 45#p546959 for all details
Finale 3.7 > 27.4.1, GPO5, ASUS laptop, 18.4'' display, Intel Core i7, 32GB RAM, WIN 10 Pro, Cubase
I read their license policy. It's not worth the effort for a music hobbyist like me. Finale at least lets me deregister and reregister electronically. I prefer SilverFrost Fortran; their only restriction is that all output gets a watermark if using the free edition.
To question 2:
I believe it's worth it.
Before starting a "real" project though, just make sure that what you can't compromise with can be done without too cumbersome workarounds.
When I started working with Dorico I made a script for the numpad emulating Finale's shortcuts, that made things easier.
For a power user the entry phase in Finale is much more efficient, but Dorico wins when it comes to layout, spacing, and NOT having to micro adjust details ad nauseam. So in all, for the projects I can do in Dorico, I save time and money.
I believe it's worth it.
Before starting a "real" project though, just make sure that what you can't compromise with can be done without too cumbersome workarounds.
When I started working with Dorico I made a script for the numpad emulating Finale's shortcuts, that made things easier.
For a power user the entry phase in Finale is much more efficient, but Dorico wins when it comes to layout, spacing, and NOT having to micro adjust details ad nauseam. So in all, for the projects I can do in Dorico, I save time and money.
Finale 2014.5, Finale 25, Dorico 4, Musescore 4
Windows 11
Windows 11
- ebiggs1
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:57 am
- Finale Version: Finale 27.3
- Operating System: Windows
I am quite involved with several schools around here including four universities. All of them use either Sibelius or Finale. Not that, that means anything, just saying. As far as I can tell none have any notion of changing.dankreider wrote: Not trying to be a Dorico evangelist here. I continue to deeply appreciate Finale and will keep using it as needed. Just thrilled at the new third option besides Finale and Sibelius (sorry, Lilypond, Musescore, et al!).
-Dan
I do think Finale is falling behind in true upgrades and features. If they don't up their game they could find themselves looking in from the outside.
Finale 27.4.1 - Perfect Layout Silver - Note Performer 4.4 - SmartScore Pro 64 - Windows 11
President, The Shawnee Concert Band, Composer/Arranger, retired Music Teacher.
President, The Shawnee Concert Band, Composer/Arranger, retired Music Teacher.
I've been playing with Dorico 2.0 Pro for 10 days now with the free trial they offer. Maybe I'm just old and unable to change paradigms, but for me, and the way I write/arrange/compose Finale makes a lot more sense. People complain about Finale having a steep learning curve and being very difficult to master - it is! But Dorico is not one bit easier, and some things are harder. Plus, so far it has no 3rd party support like TG and Patterson. I just hope Make Music is doing well and they will continue to improve and debug Finale - for me, and I suspect many others, it's perfectly fine and does what we need. If they would just find a way to make multi-movements easier!
- dankreider
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:14 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 25.5
- Operating System: Windows
@mghaub: again, not trying to proselytize here, but the first step is to watch the excellent tutorials: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIOwP1 ... 50&sort=dd
If you just jump in, I agree it's frustrating and baffling. But I watched the tutorials first—actually going on 3 times now—and it helped immensely. Dorico is different but I find myself quickly adapting.
I'm not abandoning Finale by any means. Just loving Dorico as well.
If you just jump in, I agree it's frustrating and baffling. But I watched the tutorials first—actually going on 3 times now—and it helped immensely. Dorico is different but I find myself quickly adapting.
The ONLY reason for these 3rd-party tools is to fix shortcomings in Finale. Why would you prefer a program that required all sorts of extras to accomplish basic tasks?mbhaub wrote:it has no 3rd party support like TG and Patterson
Multi-movements in Dorico is a simple thing, just saying.mbhaub wrote:If they would just find a way to make multi-movements easier!
I'm not abandoning Finale by any means. Just loving Dorico as well.
Finale 25.5
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us
- MikeHalloran
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2017 2:56 am
- Finale Version: 27
- Operating System: Mac
Yea, absolute deal breaker with me.The only lacking feature that I am personally inconvenienced by is manual lyric baseline adjustment,
Mike Halloran
Finale 27.4.1, SmartScore X2 Pro, GPO5 & World Instruments
MacOS Ventura 14.5 (public beta); 2023 Studio M2 Ultra, 192G RAM, 8TB; 2021 MBAir M1
NotePerformer4, Dorico 5, Overture, Notion 6, DP 11, Logic Pro
Finale 27.4.1, SmartScore X2 Pro, GPO5 & World Instruments
MacOS Ventura 14.5 (public beta); 2023 Studio M2 Ultra, 192G RAM, 8TB; 2021 MBAir M1
NotePerformer4, Dorico 5, Overture, Notion 6, DP 11, Logic Pro
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 7:24 pm
- Finale Version: 25.2
- Operating System: Windows
I'm having another look with the 2.0 demo. There's no online help for play mode. I appears you can only address 1 MIDI port (16Ch). Can that be true?
Finale 25, Overture, Sibelius, Notion, Cubase, StaffPad
Win10 x64, 32GB RAM, Focusrite Scarlett 18i20
Kontakt, VSL VI Pro, VE Pro, EWQL Orch, Choirs and Pianos
August Foster 190
Win10 x64, 32GB RAM, Focusrite Scarlett 18i20
Kontakt, VSL VI Pro, VE Pro, EWQL Orch, Choirs and Pianos
August Foster 190
- dankreider
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:14 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 25.5
- Operating System: Windows
I haven’t gotten that far yet. The documentation is in progress. In the meantime, check out of the Dorico YouTube channel, go to playlists, “how to: play mode.”
Finale 25.5
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us
Windows 10
Garritan mostly
General Editor at gracemusic.us