Floating Ossias: strange phenomena
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 6:49 pm
Finale 26, MacOS 10.14.4.
I am editing an instrumental part, earlier extracted from a score which contains a floating ossia measure in this part. As I said in an earlier post, the extracted part contained the floating ossia measure, but the measure was empty. I should still welcome responses to this, but in the meantime I have removed the empty ossia measure from the individual part I am working on and have created the relevant ossia anew in the extracted part itself. In doing this I encountered some strange phenomena, about which, too, I should very much welcome responses.
1. The User Manual says ‘In a scratch staff, enter the music…’. ’Scratch staff’, it turns out, simply means an additional staff which can later be hidden. In creating such a one via Staff Tool > New blank staves > Number of staves > 1, one is asked how far below the existing staff the new one should lie. I specified a distance of 1.5”, so as to make it easy to enter the alternative music. This had the effect of temporarily changing the number of measures on each page. And either this fact or some other had the bizarre effect of reducing the staff height for the whole of the part I was editing, starting from the page after the one including the ossia.
I was unable to correct this and had to start over again. This time, I set the distance below the original staff to 0.1” — just enough to distinguish the handle of the new staff from that of the existing one — and pulled down the new staff only in the system containing the measure in which to enter the ossia. After entering the ossia music, I dragged the scratch staff in that system back up to only 0.1” below the main staff. As a result the number of measures per page returned to the original, and the bizarre shrinking of subsequent staves was avoided.
Should this procedure not be described in the User Manual? Or is there a simpler way of preventing the subsequent shrinking of staves?
2. The ossia is an alternative version of the whole of measure 78. But when I arrived at the Ossia Measure Designer dialog, the small box at the top, where one chooses whether to attach the ossia to a page or a measure, said ‘Attach to measure 81’. Why? And why did this not change to 78 when I specified ’78’ for ‘Source Measure’ lower down in the dialog? In fact the ’81’ at the top could not be changed at all. This is very confusing. When, by contrast, I tried following the diktat of the ’81’ at the top and specified 81 as the Source Measure, the resulting ossia measure was completely misplaced.
I hope that there are simpler and less time-consuming ways of avoiding these ambiguities and errors. I should be most grateful for instructions, or for comments on the above.
I am editing an instrumental part, earlier extracted from a score which contains a floating ossia measure in this part. As I said in an earlier post, the extracted part contained the floating ossia measure, but the measure was empty. I should still welcome responses to this, but in the meantime I have removed the empty ossia measure from the individual part I am working on and have created the relevant ossia anew in the extracted part itself. In doing this I encountered some strange phenomena, about which, too, I should very much welcome responses.
1. The User Manual says ‘In a scratch staff, enter the music…’. ’Scratch staff’, it turns out, simply means an additional staff which can later be hidden. In creating such a one via Staff Tool > New blank staves > Number of staves > 1, one is asked how far below the existing staff the new one should lie. I specified a distance of 1.5”, so as to make it easy to enter the alternative music. This had the effect of temporarily changing the number of measures on each page. And either this fact or some other had the bizarre effect of reducing the staff height for the whole of the part I was editing, starting from the page after the one including the ossia.
I was unable to correct this and had to start over again. This time, I set the distance below the original staff to 0.1” — just enough to distinguish the handle of the new staff from that of the existing one — and pulled down the new staff only in the system containing the measure in which to enter the ossia. After entering the ossia music, I dragged the scratch staff in that system back up to only 0.1” below the main staff. As a result the number of measures per page returned to the original, and the bizarre shrinking of subsequent staves was avoided.
Should this procedure not be described in the User Manual? Or is there a simpler way of preventing the subsequent shrinking of staves?
2. The ossia is an alternative version of the whole of measure 78. But when I arrived at the Ossia Measure Designer dialog, the small box at the top, where one chooses whether to attach the ossia to a page or a measure, said ‘Attach to measure 81’. Why? And why did this not change to 78 when I specified ’78’ for ‘Source Measure’ lower down in the dialog? In fact the ’81’ at the top could not be changed at all. This is very confusing. When, by contrast, I tried following the diktat of the ’81’ at the top and specified 81 as the Source Measure, the resulting ossia measure was completely misplaced.
I hope that there are simpler and less time-consuming ways of avoiding these ambiguities and errors. I should be most grateful for instructions, or for comments on the above.