Cross staff/reverse stem beam extension woes
Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker
- Jay Emmes
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:29 pm
- Finale Version: 25.4.1.164
- Operating System: Mac
For some obscure reason Finale haphazardly decides to extend the upper beam in cross staff and reversed stem figures at one time, but the lower beam at other times. Why does Finale do that? More importantly: how can I convince Finale that extending the lower beam never ever makes any sense whatsoever, at all, ever?
Running Finale 25.4.1.163 in OS X 10.11.6
- Peter Thomsen
- Posts: 6626
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 6:47 pm
- Finale Version: Finale v27.4
- Operating System: Mac
Jay Emmes,
I suggest that you attach (a short excerpt from) the Finale document from which your attached graphic was made.
If we can examine the Finale document with the actual beaming, then we might be able to explain, what is going on, and perhaps also suggest alternate solutions.
I suggest that you attach (a short excerpt from) the Finale document from which your attached graphic was made.
If we can examine the Finale document with the actual beaming, then we might be able to explain, what is going on, and perhaps also suggest alternate solutions.
Mac OS X 12.6.9 (Monterey), Finale user since 1996
- Jay Emmes
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:29 pm
- Finale Version: 25.4.1.164
- Operating System: Mac
There is no need to attach a Finale file. The parameters of both figures are exactly the same. The only difference — and apparently the culprit — is the cross staff G (second 32nd note of the figure in the upper half of the image).
When a figure consists of only one cross staff moment (lower figure in the image), Finale will beam correctly with the upper beam (largest note value) as the beam shared by all notes and break all other beams where desired. If, however, there are more than one cross staff moments in a figure (upper figure in the image), then Finale will use the beam of the smallest note value as the shared one and break all other beams.
This makes no sense whatsoever. The beam shared by all notes in a figure is the beam of the largest note value (8th), not of the smallest one. What Finale does is incorrect and terribly ugly.
I do have a solution to make a relatively simple figure look graphically correct, but I hate the fact that, again, I have to put a lot of effort into correcting Finale where this should not be necessary. All too often, Finale is a tool that works against me instead of helping me to get the job done.
When a figure consists of only one cross staff moment (lower figure in the image), Finale will beam correctly with the upper beam (largest note value) as the beam shared by all notes and break all other beams where desired. If, however, there are more than one cross staff moments in a figure (upper figure in the image), then Finale will use the beam of the smallest note value as the shared one and break all other beams.
This makes no sense whatsoever. The beam shared by all notes in a figure is the beam of the largest note value (8th), not of the smallest one. What Finale does is incorrect and terribly ugly.
I do have a solution to make a relatively simple figure look graphically correct, but I hate the fact that, again, I have to put a lot of effort into correcting Finale where this should not be necessary. All too often, Finale is a tool that works against me instead of helping me to get the job done.
Running Finale 25.4.1.163 in OS X 10.11.6
- Peter Thomsen
- Posts: 6626
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 6:47 pm
- Finale Version: Finale v27.4
- Operating System: Mac
Actually there is need - since I am unable to duplicate your problem.Jay Emmes wrote:There is no need to attach a Finale file …
See the attached graphics, and the attached Finale document.
Mac OS X 12.6.9 (Monterey), Finale user since 1996