Secondary Beams over rests in Layers

General notation questions, including advanced notation, formatting, etc., go here.

Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker

loff56
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2019 11:07 pm
Finale Version: 26.3
Operating System: Mac

Post by loff56 » Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:45 am

Is this a bug??

If you have "Extend Secondary Beams Over Rests" selected in the Beams section of the Doc Options AND you have "Consolidate Rests" in the Layers section checked then the secondary beams will only extend over rests for the active layer! Weird. (This behaves like this in a fresh default document.). See the pictures. In the first pic Layer 1 is active, second picture Layer 2. And this isn't just a screen drawing issue, depending on which layer is active it will print like that.

Finale 26.2, Mac OSX - Catalina.
Screen Shot 2020-06-02 at 9.41.07 PM.png
Screen Shot 2020-06-02 at 9.40.37 PM.png


User avatar
zuill
Posts: 4418
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:35 pm
Finale Version: Finale 2011-v26.3.1
Operating System: Windows

Post by zuill » Wed Jun 03, 2020 2:34 am

You can leave that option on if it works for most of the document. Then, for those measures with 2 layers, use Jari's JW Change plugin to easily fix this. You can first remove the option for combining rests for just that measure (or measures) and then use the plugin to center the rests, which will combine them.

Zuill
Windows 10, Finale 2011-v26.3.1
"When all is said and done, more is said than done."

loff56
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2019 11:07 pm
Finale Version: 26.3
Operating System: Mac

Post by loff56 » Wed Jun 03, 2020 3:11 am

Ah, good fix Zuill!

I guess it is a bug though. It's definitely related to the "Consolidate Rests" feature, or a combination of both features being active at the same time. When you turn off the automatic "Consolidate Rests" feature it doesn't behave like this; even if you manually combine the rests - which is effectively what the JW plug-in is doing evidently.

Thanks for the idea Zuill. Wonder if anyone has reported this as a bug. Hmmmm...

User avatar
zuill
Posts: 4418
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:35 pm
Finale Version: Finale 2011-v26.3.1
Operating System: Windows

Post by zuill » Wed Jun 03, 2020 3:33 am

It seems that it has been here since consolidating rests has been a feature.

Zuill
Windows 10, Finale 2011-v26.3.1
"When all is said and done, more is said than done."

User avatar
miker
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:28 pm
Finale Version: Finale 27.4
Operating System: Mac

Post by miker » Wed Jun 03, 2020 3:47 am

I had a similar issue years ago, where if you had triplets in both layers where the first entry was a rest, strange things happened. I think it would only display the bracket on one or the other.
Finale 27 | SmartScorePro 64
Mac OS 13.2.1 Ventura
Copyist for Barbershop Harmony Society

User avatar
motet
Posts: 8276
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
Operating System: Windows

Post by motet » Wed Jun 03, 2020 4:39 am

It's certainly a bug, and it's bizarre that turning on Extend Secondary Beams Over Rests breaks the beam on the first two sixteenths of the non-active layer of beat 4--there's not even a rest there!

TGTools has a function "Join rests of multiple layers," which does the right thing. I think it does what JC Change does as described by Zuill above--it moves them on top of each other.

User avatar
motet
Posts: 8276
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
Operating System: Windows

Post by motet » Wed Jun 03, 2020 6:43 am

A feather in Finale's cap is that in this extreme situation
.
0502.png
.
Finale does the right thing
.
0503.png
.
but TG Tools does this
.
0504.png
.

User avatar
motet
Posts: 8276
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
Operating System: Windows

Post by motet » Wed Jun 03, 2020 6:46 am

It would be much easier to fix that in JW Change, so it does seem the best solution.

Post Reply