Page 1 of 3

Cimbasso

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:06 pm
by motet
Anyone here know anything about the cimbasso? It's a sort of bass valve trombone, which I've seen Verdi use in lieu of a tuba. Someone on Facebook said they used Change Instrument to cimbasso and Finale gave it a Bb transposition, bass clef. I only know it from Italian opera, where it's a non-transposing instrument. Is it perhaps used in band music and notated transposed? Treble or bass clef?

Or did MakeMusic put every instrument they could think of in the instrument list, Google "cimbasso" and see mention of an instrument physically in Bb, and jump to the conclusion that it's notated that way?

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:27 pm
by David Ward
The cimbasso is now well (re)established this side of the Atlantic, primarily for Italian opera. When I saw Scottish Opera's touring production of Tosca in Inverness a year ago, the fourth trombone part was played on a modern cimbasso. In its current incarnation it is a valve contrabass trombone designed to be played by a tuba player, and in an orchestra uses the same notation as the bass tuba (ie non-transposing bass clef).

If used in a band, I suspect the transposition (or not) would depend on the particular national and other conventions around band transpositions.

I have written for the instrument myself, and it is readily available in UK and European opera orchestras. I believe Hans Werner Henze used two in one piece, and also that various film composers have written for multi cimbassi. Its sound is rather similar to that of the contrabass trombone, although it is less free blowing while also less cumbersome to play (although contrabass trombones such as those made by Rath http://www.rathtrombones.com/#p=contrabass-trombones are far, far more manageable than those of 25 years ago. As a result, the contrabass trombone too has been fully revived where appropriate. eg Scottish opera used one in Falstaff not very long ago.)

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:28 pm
by HaraldS
I know it as a non-transposing instrument. The Vienna Symphonic Library page on the Cimbasso is quite helpful and correct: https://www.vsl.co.at/en/Brass/Cimbasso

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:43 pm
by motet
That's interesting, David, because Falstaff is written for Bass Trombone rather than Cimbasso (the part goes down to a low F), as is Tosca.

Major companies in the U.S. like the Met use cimbassi as well, but I don't know if they use them as a substitute for trombone.

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:10 am
by Callasmaniac
In Verdi's time all trombones (in Italy) were valve trombones. This explains some of the acrobatic passages in e.g. Rossini operas. And "true" cimbasso (again, in Verdi's time) was a bassoon-like wooden instrument with cup mouthpiece. The modern cimbasso - a formidable instrument in its own right - is maybe too heavy for some Verdi/contemporary writing. Some sources recommend narrowbored tuba as better substitution. See picture and more info here: https://www.berliozhistoricalbrass.org/cimbasso.htm .

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:59 pm
by ebiggs1
Or did MakeMusic put every instrument they could think of in the instrument list
You are not thinking of writing any music for one? Good luck finding somebody that has one or knows how to play it.
The contrabass trombone is rare enough and is also difficult to play too.

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:14 pm
by zuill
I know nothing about these legacy instruments. However, this talk took me back to my Freshman year at Chapman University (College back then). In our music supply room in the very old music building were 2 instruments that I had never seen before. One was an upright piano with a full pedal board, for organists to practice. The other was a Sarrusophone. I'm guessing it is also in a category of instruments that had their day, but are hard to come by today.

Zuill

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:36 pm
by motet
When I was in the University Symphony at Berkeley the conductor wanted me to play the ophicleide in the Midsummer Night's Dream overture--the department had one! I thought it would be fun, but I'm a horn player and it had a trombone-like mouthpiece and I didn't want to risk my embouchure on it since there were other pieces to play on the program.
ebiggs1 wrote:
Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:59 pm
Or did MakeMusic put every instrument they could think of in the instrument list
You are not thinking of writing any music for one? Good luck finding somebody that has one or knows how to play it.
The contrabass trombone is rare enough and is also difficult to play too.
No, this came up on Facebook. Someone used Change Instrument to change from tuba to cimbasso and was surprised to see two sharps added to the key signature when he did.

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:42 pm
by zuill
Now that I look at a picture of an Ophicleide, maybe that was the instrument we had. I heard people call it Sarrusophone, but they may have been wrong.

Zuill

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:51 pm
by Anders Hedelin
Brass instruments seem to be like yoghurts today. They come in all tastes and shapes.

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:31 pm
by David Ward
zuill wrote:
Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:14 pm
I know nothing about these legacy instruments.… … …
I don't think the cimbasso, at least in its modern incarnation, should be thought of as a ‘legacy instrument’. Most (maybe all) medium and large opera houses in the UK & Western Europe use the instrument regularly and it should be available to the symphony orchestras if required. It's purpose for a modern composer would be to provide a contrabass sound which blends easily with the trombones without requiring a fourth trombone player, but instead can be played by the regular tuba player. During the last few decades it has become a normal modern instrument in many circles and its current incarnation is still undergoing improvement and refinement. There are several makers of the instrument.

BTW Verdi expected various small tubas (or flicorni) to be used in an on-stage or back-stage banda, but very much disliked having a tuba in the orchestra pit.

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 1:00 am
by bkshepard
David Ward wrote:
Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:31 pm
I don't think the cimbasso, at least in its modern incarnation, should be thought of as a ‘legacy instrument’.
The Cimbasso has become a pretty standard instrument for "brassy" film scores. In addition to seeing it in the studio these days, many of the better brass sample libraries that cater to film composers also include the Cimbasso in their library.

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:16 am
by zuill
David Ward wrote:
Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:31 pm
zuill wrote:
Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:14 pm
I know nothing about these legacy instruments.… … …
I don't think the cimbasso, at least in its modern incarnation, should be thought of as a ‘legacy instrument’.
Sorry about my misunderstanding.

Zuill

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:19 pm
by ebiggs1
I have been a trombone player/teacher for decades upon decades. It would be a real challenge to make a living being a cimbasso or contrabass trombone player. :shock:

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:38 pm
by Anders Hedelin
So, what's the difference in sound between a cimbasso and a bass trombone, and a cimbasso and a (bass) tuba?

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:45 pm
by ebiggs1
Nothing if you are comparing one of them to a good bass trombone player like Edward Kleinhammer or Charles Vernon. And, that is probably why you don't see them.

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:51 pm
by Anders Hedelin
I was hoping for a more serious answer this time. There must be some reason for the cimbasso still being used. And if not in sound, maybe in playabilty?

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:28 pm
by ebiggs1
I was hoping for a more serious answer this time.
That was a reality answer. The contrabass trombone is not an easy instrument to play. They are extremely expensive for their possible return, too.
I have never played a cimbasso so I can't comment on its playability. I think, at least I heard, KU has one but I never saw it or touched it if they do.

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:55 pm
by motet
I would imagine, being valved, it's more facile and more capable of playing legato.

From what I've seen in Verdi, the cimbasso's range is more akin to a regular bass trombone, the larger-bore instrument in Bb with two thumb triggers.

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 5:16 pm
by Gareth Green
Just a little fun, but this may be of some interest in the context of this thread. This recording uses a mixture of tenor, bass & contrabass trombones, together with both cimbassos (cimbassi ... ? ) and bass tubas.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTDEVUlCClk

It is truly impressive, but, perhaps not meant to be taken seriously ... ;-)

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 5:18 pm
by ebiggs1
Nobody has mentioned the Miraphone Python tuba.
python.jpg

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 5:22 pm
by Anders Hedelin
ebiggs1 wrote:
Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:28 pm
Nothing if you are comparing one of them to a good bass trombone player like Edward Kleinhammer or Charles Vernon.
- - -
That was a reality answer. The contrabass trombone is not an easy instrument to play.
I was thinking more along the line that the instrument generally sounded this or that way in the hands of a sufficiently skilled orchestra musician, not a prominent soloist (they can make any instrument sound very different from what you'd expect).

Ok, point taken.

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:49 pm
by David Ward
Anders Hedelin wrote:
Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:38 pm
So, what's the difference in sound between a cimbasso and a bass trombone, and a cimbasso and a (bass) tuba?
To my ear, and I'm well used to hearing both cimbasso & contrabass trombones in opera orchestras, where both are perfectly regular and normal, at least this side of the Atlantic, the difference between cimbasso and tuba is huge. The tuba has a much rounder and ‘fatter’ sound than any kind of trombone, while the cimbasso sounds like a natural contrabass to the trombones and blends with them. This gives an Italian rather than a German sound to the orchestra.

The low F in Falstaff mentioned above by Motet, is readily playable on a bass trombone as a ‘pedal’ (ie fundamental), while on a contrabass trombone it can be played as a second harmonic. In general, pedal notes are a little more flatulent in sound than second harmonics. Also the bore, mouthpiece (and more) of a contrabass trombone favour clear focus of these very low notes.

In general the cimbasso sounds rather similar but not identical to the contrabass trombone. It is less free blowing, and its playing psychology is different. One would not want to use a cimbasso in Wagner or Strauss (where one will also have a low tuba as a separate instrument in the score even when a contrabass trombone is present), but in late Verdi or Puccini, contrabass trombone and cimbasso may be almost interchangeable, perhaps depending on which players are available. (See my comments above about two performances by Scottish Opera.) One would probably never want to choose the contrabass trombone rather than the cimbasso for Verdi before Otello.

Use of the tuba in Verdi's orchestra is now rather frowned upon in the UK and Western Europe, although one still encounters it in many (but not all) performances of the Requiem.

This is how things are now; but instrument designs, playing techniques and fashions (and research) are ever-changing.

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 7:47 pm
by motet
Puccini only ever wrote the bottom brass part for "Trombone basso." Is a contrabass trombone and a bass trombone the same thing?

Re: Cimbasso

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:21 pm
by ebiggs1
No, they are not.