OT - time signatures - international terminology

General notation questions, including advanced notation, formatting, etc., go here.

Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker

Post Reply
Andreo Basisto
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 2:11 pm
Finale Version: 2011
Operating System: Windows

Post by Andreo Basisto » Wed Jan 13, 2021 8:42 pm

Greetings all

I hope you’ll allow me a non-Finale question. I am currently working on a music terminology in Esperanto. Concerning time signatures, I’ve always classed them as either ‘simple’ or ‘compound’, but a Polish colleague doesn’t accept that. In Poland time signatures are either ‘simple’ or ‘combined’. They are all based on 2 beats or 3 beats, so, for example 4/4 is a combined 2/4 + 2/4; 6/8 is a combined 3/8 + 3/8.

It would be good to find out which of the two systems is the most widespread in the world.

Many thanks in advance!

Andreo Basisto


User avatar
motet
Posts: 8231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
Operating System: Windows

Post by motet » Wed Jan 13, 2021 9:11 pm

Never heard of "combined." In any case, you perhaps still want to distinguish between what most people call simple and compound, which it looks like the Polish system doesn't do.

User avatar
HaraldS
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:46 am
Finale Version: 25.5
Operating System: Windows

Post by HaraldS » Fri Jan 15, 2021 12:43 am

Andreo Basisto wrote:
Wed Jan 13, 2021 8:42 pm
In Poland time signatures are either ‘simple’ or ‘combined’. They are all based on 2 beats or 3 beats, so, for example 4/4 is a combined 2/4 + 2/4; 6/8 is a combined 3/8 + 3/8.
This is not necessarily a typical polish terminology, but merely describes the historic origin of time signatures, which derive from the proportions in mensural notation (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensural_notation).
Whether you prefer "compound" or "combined" is a matter of taste.
Finale 3.0-25.5, German edition, Windows 7
trombonist, pianist, conductor / Recklinghausen, Germany

User avatar
motet
Posts: 8231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
Operating System: Windows

Post by motet » Fri Jan 15, 2021 1:11 am

If 4/4 is "combined" as Andreo said, it's not just a matter of taste.

Andreo Basisto
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 2:11 pm
Finale Version: 2011
Operating System: Windows

Post by Andreo Basisto » Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:29 pm

Greetings Motet and HaraldS - Just a quick reply to thank you for your comments. I'm pleased to say that my Polish friend has now 'come round' to my way of thinking and has realised that the simple/compound way of grouping time signatures is probably universal and that the Polish system is possibly unique to Poland.

We have both learnt a lot from this exercise and our e-mail discussions.

Thanks again for your contribution

Andreo Basisto

User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 827
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:41 am
Finale Version: Finale 25.5
Operating System: Mac

Post by John Ruggero » Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:41 pm

Interesting to hear about the "Polish" system, Andreo. I prefer it to the simple/compound terminology, which has alway struck me as illogical. 4/4 is as "compound" as 6/8.
2020 M1 Mac mini (OS 12.6) Finale 25.5, Dorico, Affinity Publisher, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard Maestro
www.cantilenapress.com

"The better the composer, the better the notation."

User avatar
Jay Emmes
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:29 pm
Finale Version: 25.4.1.164
Operating System: Mac

Post by Jay Emmes » Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:13 pm

It is certainly not strictly Polish to name any time signature that does not simply consist of two or three beats 'compound', because that's what the word 'compound' means. For some odd reason terminology that makes no sense at all has taken ground in the Anglo-Saxon world. In other languages the difference between a simple (meter that consists of either two or three beats, 2/4, ⅜, etc.) and a compounded meter (composed of more than one group of either two or three beats, 4/4, 5/4, 6/8, etc.) is still respected.
Running Finale 25.4.1.163 in OS X 10.11.6

User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 827
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:41 am
Finale Version: Finale 25.5
Operating System: Mac

Post by John Ruggero » Thu Jan 28, 2021 2:15 am

Thanks for that information, Jay. We Anglo-Saxons need to change our illogical ways.
2020 M1 Mac mini (OS 12.6) Finale 25.5, Dorico, Affinity Publisher, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard Maestro
www.cantilenapress.com

"The better the composer, the better the notation."

User avatar
motet
Posts: 8231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
Operating System: Windows

Post by motet » Thu Jan 28, 2021 3:27 am

I think there has to be some way of referring to 6/8, 9/8, 12/8, etc. collectively.

User avatar
Jay Emmes
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:29 pm
Finale Version: 25.4.1.164
Operating System: Mac

Post by Jay Emmes » Fri Jan 29, 2021 3:43 pm

motet wrote:
Thu Jan 28, 2021 3:27 am
I think there has to be some way of referring to 6/8, 9/8, 12/8, etc. collectively.
Certainly: compound meters. 6/8 Being compounded of two groups of three eights, 9/8 of three groups of three eights, etc.. Just as 4/4 (two groups of two quarters) and 5/4 (two groups, one of two and one of three or vice versa) are compound meters.

Why call a meter 'compound' when the grouped beat consists of three rather than two units? What is compounded in that? Musical meters, as well as linguistic metres, always divide into rhythmical groupings of two or three notes/syllables. So, two units on a beat is as 'simple' as three units. A meter is compounded when it consists of more than one group (4/4 instead of 2/4, e.g.), regardless whether that group consists of two or three units or the compounded meter is a mixture of groups of two and three units. In short: compound would be what now is known as duple, triple, quadruple, etc..

Just out of curiosity: what would a 5/4 time signature be as the nomenclature in English now is? A 'both simple and compound duple meter'?
Running Finale 25.4.1.163 in OS X 10.11.6

Andreo Basisto
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 2:11 pm
Finale Version: 2011
Operating System: Windows

Post by Andreo Basisto » Sun Jan 31, 2021 3:09 pm

Greetings all!

Many thanks for the extra contributions from John Ruggero and Jay Emmes. Hmm – it seems that my Polish friend has some support!

However, as I have already mentioned, he now accepts the system of ‘simple’ and ‘compound’ time signatures, but I have not used those terms in my Terminology as I feel that they don’t tell us anything useful (as indeed Jay points out). My terms will be takto duerpulsa (metre with a two-part pulse) and takto trierpulsa (metre with a three-part pulse) to distinguish between traditional simple and compound. So we can have, for example tritakto duerpulsa (simple triple) and kvintakto trierpulsa (compound quintuple).

Andreo

Post Reply