shorten final bar?

General notation questions, including advanced notation, formatting, etc., go here.

Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker

Post Reply
bj nick
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:10 am
Finale Version: v26, NP3
Operating System: Windows

Post by bj nick » Sun Jun 12, 2022 3:37 pm

This is typical: I set "fit measures" to, say, 4 bars throughout....but last bar is all by itself occupying a whole page. How do I set that last bar to be a normal bar and leave the rest blank, rather than leaving a hugely elongated last bar? Or is there a better way to think of this? Thanks.
Finale v. 26, Windows 10, NP3, Garritan Instruments for Finale


User avatar
motet
Posts: 8284
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
Operating System: Windows

Post by motet » Sun Jun 12, 2022 3:50 pm

Typically, it would be incorporated into the previous page. Most printed music varies the number of measures per system based on the content of the measures rather than a fixed number per system. If your have four per system and the total number of measures is not a multiple of four, though, you're going to have this problem.

BuonTempi
Posts: 1307
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:59 am
Finale Version: Finale 27
Operating System: Mac

Post by BuonTempi » Sun Jun 12, 2022 3:55 pm

Typically, you would 'knock' that bar back, so that the last system has 5 bars; or find a better fit for a 5-bar system at some other place; or maybe have 3+3+3 bars per system for the last 3 systems, instead of 4+4+1.

Conventionally, systems don't 'finish early', unless there's some particular reason.

You can knock the bar back by selecting it and pressing the Up arrow.

bj nick
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:10 am
Finale Version: v26, NP3
Operating System: Windows

Post by bj nick » Sun Jun 12, 2022 4:36 pm

Knocking the bar back would be an obvious solution for sure, doesn't always work, when the last bar, or next to last or whatever, has a zillion notes in it. But that's probably the best way to think about it, look for a spot in the previous system where I can space the bars differently. Yes, of course, restricting bars to the setting can't always be strictly followed; I use the up and down arrows and readjust wherever necessary. Thanks for this, it's helpful.
Finale v. 26, Windows 10, NP3, Garritan Instruments for Finale

BuonTempi
Posts: 1307
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:59 am
Finale Version: Finale 27
Operating System: Mac

Post by BuonTempi » Sun Jun 12, 2022 5:40 pm

bj nick wrote:
Sun Jun 12, 2022 4:36 pm
doesn't always work, when the last bar, or next to last or whatever, has a zillion notes in it.
If it's got a zillion notes, then try 2 or 3 bars in the last system, and try to 'balance' a few systems above it.

But the bottom line is: make the music fit the width; don't make the width fit the music.

bj nick
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:10 am
Finale Version: v26, NP3
Operating System: Windows

Post by bj nick » Sun Jun 12, 2022 7:17 pm

Excellent. Got it. The key message is: "Conventionally, systems don't 'finish early', unless there's some particular reason."
Finale v. 26, Windows 10, NP3, Garritan Instruments for Finale

User avatar
motet
Posts: 8284
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
Operating System: Windows

Post by motet » Sun Jun 12, 2022 10:58 pm

If some bars have a zillion notes and others don't, all the more reason to not have a fixed number of bars per system. Unless you're writing a lead sheet in rhythmic notation or something like that, it will look amateurish. Unlock the systems and let Finale's spacing algorithm figure out where the line breaks should go.

bj nick
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:10 am
Finale Version: v26, NP3
Operating System: Windows

Post by bj nick » Sun Jun 12, 2022 11:44 pm

Honestly I never even considered that, as a default? On my templates when I start a new piece, I generally have some idea whether it's going to be a notety, busy kind of piece maybe for one instrument or a couple, just a general idea of whether systems will be three or four bars or whatever. What are you suggesting? I'm really interested in hearing it.
Finale v. 26, Windows 10, NP3, Garritan Instruments for Finale

User avatar
motet
Posts: 8284
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
Operating System: Windows

Post by motet » Sun Jun 12, 2022 11:56 pm

I'm suggesting letting Finale do its thing. Music spacing will determine the number of measures per line. Enter all your music on unlocked staves with automatic music spacing on, and only when you're done with all that worry about moving a few measures around or adjusting notes.

bj nick
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:10 am
Finale Version: v26, NP3
Operating System: Windows

Post by bj nick » Wed Jul 06, 2022 4:24 pm

Sorry, didn't remember to respond, but I agree w/your suggestion. I think this mostly has to do with my routine of working in Page View, which I should avoid until it's time to get things finalized. Thanks for the suggestion.
Finale v. 26, Windows 10, NP3, Garritan Instruments for Finale

User avatar
miker
Posts: 6013
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:28 pm
Finale Version: Finale 27.4
Operating System: Mac

Post by miker » Wed Jul 06, 2022 4:39 pm

Right, Barry. Stay in scroll view, until pretty much everything is in. Then go to page view for the setup.
Finale 27 | SmartScorePro 64
Mac OS 13.2.1 Ventura
Copyist for Barbershop Harmony Society

User avatar
John Ruggero
Posts: 827
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:41 am
Finale Version: Finale 25.5
Operating System: Mac

Post by John Ruggero » Fri Jul 08, 2022 8:49 pm

It's not necessary to stay in scroll view to achieve a good layout. As Motet said, let Finale do its thing (and in whatever view you are most comfortable in), and then go through the result in page view and improve it. Rarely does Finale get it right on its own; the various factors are far too complex.
2020 M1 Mac mini (OS 12.6) Finale 25.5, Dorico, Affinity Publisher, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard Maestro
www.cantilenapress.com

"The better the composer, the better the notation."

Post Reply