best method for exporting as .pdf's?
Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker
-
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:10 am
- Finale Version: v26, NP3
- Operating System: Windows
There was a big discussion of this previously, but it was complex, and I want to just cut to the chase: I find that even after careful proofreading/editing, when I export to PDF, there will be lots of problems: hairpins are squished or too long, collisions, and this is, again, AFTER carefully getting everything just right. What do pro engravers do to avoid endless proofing of PDF's; which involves making things "wrong" in Finale, to get it "right" in the PDF?? (example: a hairpin is perfect in Finale, squished in PDF, so I have to reduce the hairpin size in Finale (where it doesn't look "right"). Hoping there's a simple "do it this way and you won't have any problems."
Here's a typical example:
Here's a typical example:
Finale v. 26, Windows 10, NP3, Garritan Instruments for Finale
- N Grossingink
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:50 pm
- Finale Version: 27.3
- Operating System: Mac
Under the, uh, Tool menu.
N. Grossingink
Educational Band, Orchestra and Jazz Ensemble a specialty
Sample: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pFF5OeJDeLFGHMRyXrubFqZWXBubErw4/view?usp=share_link
Mac Mini 2014 2.6 Ghz, 8Gb RAM
OSX 10.15.7
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.3, 27.3
Educational Band, Orchestra and Jazz Ensemble a specialty
Sample: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pFF5OeJDeLFGHMRyXrubFqZWXBubErw4/view?usp=share_link
Mac Mini 2014 2.6 Ghz, 8Gb RAM
OSX 10.15.7
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.3, 27.3
- motet
- Posts: 8293
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
- Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
- Operating System: Windows
The Graphics tool export works much better than File/Export/PDF, but on Windows the Graphics tool export sometimes has subtle errors in the placement of text (these apparently don't happen on the Mac). For problem-free PDFs on Windows, use CutePDF (free).
- miker
- Posts: 6014
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:28 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 27.4
- Operating System: Mac
As N said, it’s in the tools menu, and the Main Tool palette. Click on Export… and set the type as PDF. (I’m working from memory here, so my instructions may have skipped a step. You can figure it out!)
When I was on Windows, I used CutePDF as well.
When I was on Windows, I used CutePDF as well.
Finale 27 | SmartScorePro 64
Mac OS 13.2.1 Ventura
Copyist for Barbershop Harmony Society
Mac OS 13.2.1 Ventura
Copyist for Barbershop Harmony Society
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2021 2:31 am
- Finale Version: 27.3.0
- Operating System: Windows
I have used the File>Export>PDF dialog in Windows 10 from Finale 27 to Adobe Acrobat with very little loss of information, for what it's worth. This is mostly for rehearsal parts, so my expectations might not be sufficiently exacting.
- N Grossingink
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:50 pm
- Finale Version: 27.3
- Operating System: Mac
Rehearsal parts with "very little loss of information". Doesn't sound acceptable to me.
N. Grossingink
Educational Band, Orchestra and Jazz Ensemble a specialty
Sample: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pFF5OeJDeLFGHMRyXrubFqZWXBubErw4/view?usp=share_link
Mac Mini 2014 2.6 Ghz, 8Gb RAM
OSX 10.15.7
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.3, 27.3
Educational Band, Orchestra and Jazz Ensemble a specialty
Sample: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pFF5OeJDeLFGHMRyXrubFqZWXBubErw4/view?usp=share_link
Mac Mini 2014 2.6 Ghz, 8Gb RAM
OSX 10.15.7
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.3, 27.3
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2021 2:31 am
- Finale Version: 27.3.0
- Operating System: Windows
Let me 'splain: as long as my input is clean, this workflow produces parts with pretty much all the notes and text in place, and subsequently fully editable in Finale. That is all I need for rehearsal parts, and I was pretty happy to achieve that. Some products I tried failed spectacularly. What I have not worried about is whether every element such as line thickness or nuance of font graphic presentation is preserved, or if playback is faithful. That would be later in the game, I suspect.N Grossingink wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:45 amRehearsal parts with "very little loss of information". Doesn't sound acceptable to me.
The level of complexity is a factor too. I have been importing piano scores or choral/keyboard music and applying only a few operations beyond general formatting, such as exploding/imploding, transposition, voicing, etc., to obtain string orchestra parts. The fact that the resulting parts are easily edited in Finale is huge to me. So yes, totally acceptable.
-
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:10 am
- Finale Version: v26, NP3
- Operating System: Windows
I can.....uh....find the tool menu, thanks. Actually it's under "Advanced tools," but no matter.....the thing is, clicking on Graphics, "nothing happens".....that is, I don't get a menu or window or anything. Plus I've never heard anyone mention this, ever, so it's really new to me. I will explore it, definitely. It can't be normal that it should be an endless, laborious process to get the parts proofread/edited, and THEN have to clear up a bunch of things on the PDF copies, even having to render parts "wrong" on Finale to get them looking right on PDF. I can't be doing it right.
Finale v. 26, Windows 10, NP3, Garritan Instruments for Finale
- elbsound
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 10:06 am
- Finale Version: Finale 2014.5
- Operating System: Windows
BTW, if you use my Perfect Layout plug-in, you won't run into this old Finale "Hairpin/PDF" issue.
The plug-in automatically detects those hairpins where Finale has printing problems and adjusts them, so that they print correctly.
See FAQ: https://elbsound.studio/perfect-layout/ ... -hairpins1
The plug-in automatically detects those hairpins where Finale has printing problems and adjusts them, so that they print correctly.
See FAQ: https://elbsound.studio/perfect-layout/ ... -hairpins1
-
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:10 am
- Finale Version: v26, NP3
- Operating System: Windows
Hey Anne, that sounds great. For me, though, I need the parts PERFECT; as in: someone purchases the piece from me, downloads the parts, the players put them on the stands, everything's just as it should be. If I get people asking, hey, the oboe part is missing a bar here; can you check this one passage, something doesn't sound right, etc, etc. I'm dead. I've played a zillion rehearsals/gigs where we're reading something down, and if there are mistakes/confusion w/the parts, it's a massive pain. I've had situations where I've gone home and personally re-written all the horn parts to avoid train wrecks on an important gig. So for me, I'm hoping to learn how to get things nailed so I can totally trust the parts I send out; if I have to, I'll even hire a pro to do it; too important to risk it.AnneMillington wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:42 pmThe level of complexity is a factor too. I have been importing piano scores or choral/keyboard music and applying only a few operations beyond general formatting, such as exploding/imploding, transposition, voicing, etc., to obtain string orchestra parts. The fact that the resulting parts are easily edited in Finale is huge to me. So yes, totally acceptable.N Grossingink wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 9:45 amRehearsal parts with "very little loss of information". Doesn't sound acceptable to me.
Finale v. 26, Windows 10, NP3, Garritan Instruments for Finale
Here are some screen shots: I always have to remind myself that clicking the Graphics Tool doesn't actually generate a window, so I have to go to the menubar to work with it. But after having done a lot of "Print" then "Save as PDF" and getting a pretty large file, the Graphics Tool is just so much better. I don't print anything so my needs are very different and minimal from many people here. But to save as a PDF and post it on my web site, the Graphics Tool has worked well, and it doesn't append SCORE to the file (which I prefer).bj nick wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 2:24 pmI can.....uh....find the tool menu, thanks. Actually it's under "Advanced tools," but no matter.....the thing is, clicking on Graphics, "nothing happens".....that is, I don't get a menu or window or anything. Plus I've never heard anyone mention this, ever, so it's really new to me. I will explore it, definitely. It can't be normal that it should be an endless, laborious process to get the parts proofread/edited, and THEN have to clear up a bunch of things on the PDF copies, even having to render parts "wrong" on Finale to get them looking right on PDF. I can't be doing it right.
http://dbtmusic.wordpress.com
https://dtoub.bandcamp.com/
Finale 27.x/macOS Sonoma/GPO 5/NotePerformer/Perfect Layout/Reason 12
https://dtoub.bandcamp.com/
Finale 27.x/macOS Sonoma/GPO 5/NotePerformer/Perfect Layout/Reason 12
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2021 2:31 am
- Finale Version: 27.3.0
- Operating System: Windows
I have the same need for accurate exported parts. I am pretty sure you can achieve that result with the tools at hand.
The export component of my workflow is quite acceptable. I use Finale 27, the File > Export > PDF command, and Bob's Yer Uncle. There are no mistakes, unless I made them myself in Finale. Sometimes I will print directly to a pdf, by having Adobe PDF specified as my printer, and really see no difference.
Maybe it is because I am using 27?
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2021 2:31 am
- Finale Version: 27.3.0
- Operating System: Windows
- elbsound
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 10:06 am
- Finale Version: Finale 2014.5
- Operating System: Windows
Yes, but the hairpin/PDF problem could occur with any file.The PDF problems don't happen with every file.
It depends on the length of the hairpin and the hairpin settings (opening width, line thickness).
Only if the "dangerous" hairpin lengths occur in that file, this issue will come up.
- motet
- Posts: 8293
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
- Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
- Operating System: Windows
From the O.P.'s picture, it looks like the dynamics are misplaced, not the hairpins. But there have been lots of problems reported here with File/Export/PDF over the years, including stray and wrong characters. Printing to a PDF virtual printer seems to take care of them.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2021 2:31 am
- Finale Version: 27.3.0
- Operating System: Windows
The export as graphic is what I would use if I wanted absolutely faithful reproduction of all of the glyphs in my document. I would be surprised if the OP would have the described issues with exporting to jpg or tiff.
I am late to the table in embracing pdfs, for just the reasons we are discussing. Your stuff gets messed with in pdf. But the format is ever so much better than in the olden days, and improving all the time. Most of the people I know want a pdf for importing into their own software or readers, or for printing in a controlled, consistent way. The user has to be both savvy and vigilant to do that with graphic formats.
I am late to the table in embracing pdfs, for just the reasons we are discussing. Your stuff gets messed with in pdf. But the format is ever so much better than in the olden days, and improving all the time. Most of the people I know want a pdf for importing into their own software or readers, or for printing in a controlled, consistent way. The user has to be both savvy and vigilant to do that with graphic formats.
- motet
- Posts: 8293
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
- Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
- Operating System: Windows
I'm not sure why you're arguing with this. File/Export/PDF has problems, but not every time. If it works for you, great.
The Graphics tool can create a PDF file (not just graphics formats like jpeg or tiff), just as File/Export/PDF can, but must use different code because it works better. As I said, there are some problems even with that on Windows, which is why I suggest a PDF printer instead, which is flawless. The Graphics tool export seems to not have those problems on the Mac.
The Graphics tool can create a PDF file (not just graphics formats like jpeg or tiff), just as File/Export/PDF can, but must use different code because it works better. As I said, there are some problems even with that on Windows, which is why I suggest a PDF printer instead, which is flawless. The Graphics tool export seems to not have those problems on the Mac.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2021 2:31 am
- Finale Version: 27.3.0
- Operating System: Windows
Not arguing, just offering my experience to round out the conversation.
I do like exporting to a virtual printer; I have found that to work really well. I will try exporting to pdf via graphics tool. I did not even know that existed.
I do like exporting to a virtual printer; I have found that to work really well. I will try exporting to pdf via graphics tool. I did not even know that existed.
-
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:10 am
- Finale Version: v26, NP3
- Operating System: Windows
That's a good point; the dynamics, not the hairpins....but my efforts have generally been to reduce/adjust the hairpins due to the collisions.motet wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 3:53 pmFrom the O.P.'s picture, it looks like the dynamics are misplaced, not the hairpins. But there have been lots of problems reported here with File/Export/PDF over the years, including stray and wrong characters. Printing to a PDF virtual printer seems to take care of them.
Finale v. 26, Windows 10, NP3, Garritan Instruments for Finale
-
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:10 am
- Finale Version: v26, NP3
- Operating System: Windows
I have always used Adobe; CUTE is better? Free version or do I need to get a paid version? And you're saying that's it? As in, just make CUTE the default PDF program, and just export - PDF? Lots going on here, different takes, trying to figure out get the best way to go, sorry for the basic questions.
Finale v. 26, Windows 10, NP3, Garritan Instruments for Finale