Extension of secondary beams in Finale 2010

General notation questions, including advanced notation, formatting, etc., go here.

Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker

torreigh
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:30 am

Post by torreigh » Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:37 am

Does anyone know if it's possible to extend the secondary beam in finale 2010?

I'm trying to create an accelerando-decelerando group of demi-semiquavers, (20thC notation style) but thus far i can only connect the diagonal-up:diagonal-down on the top beam. the secondary beams are stuck with a gap in between the 'turning point'; if i force-join the beams, i can only attain a one-directional beam tilt.

Pls help me out with this, thanks!


User avatar
Peter Thomsen
Posts: 6678
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 6:47 pm
Finale Version: Finale v27.4
Operating System: Mac

Post by Peter Thomsen » Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:41 am

I'm not sure I understand.

Do you mean something like this?
Attachments
Accelerando-decelerando.gif
Accelerando-decelerando.gif (3.47 KiB) Viewed 5080 times
Accelerando-decelerando.mus.zip
(6.07 KiB) Downloaded 374 times
Mac OS X 12.6.9 (Monterey), Finale user since 1996

torreigh
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:30 am

Post by torreigh » Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:45 pm

Yup that's basically it..

though the number of notes before and after the beam direction change differs; is there a way i can edit it in finale to create something like this?

thanks!

User avatar
Peter Thomsen
Posts: 6678
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 6:47 pm
Finale Version: Finale v27.4
Operating System: Mac

Post by Peter Thomsen » Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:04 pm

It's explained in the Finale .mus document I attached below my graphic image.

To create this layout I didn't extend beams.
Instead, I added an extra note to the end of the first beam group, namely a very special tuplet - a "ziplet":
one 32nd in the space of zero (1 in the space of 0)

You can't see that the "ziplet" is a tuplet, because the tuplet is set to display "Nothing" for "Number" and "Shape".

This "ziplet note" isn't seen in the layout because it's "hidden" behind the first note of the second beam group.

The "ziplet note" only serves the purpose of making the beams in the first beam group go all the way to the next beam group.

I hope that this is clear?
If not, ask again.
Mac OS X 12.6.9 (Monterey), Finale user since 1996

torreigh
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:30 am

Post by torreigh » Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:19 am

I've got it, thanks alot! =)

Post Reply