Strange/Incorrect/Unwanted Behaviour in 12/8
Moderators: Peter Thomsen, miker
-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:27 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 26.2
- Operating System: Windows
Has anyone else had to deal with this before?
There's a test file attached; it seems to be out-of-the-box default behaviour. I open a default document, change the time signature to 12/8 and enter a dotted quarter. I skip to the next measure. Auto-fill With Rests kicks in, and I am left with dotted-half rest followed by dotted-quarter rest. Surely this is incorrect? In 4/4, the default would be quarter-note, followed by quarter-rest, then half-rest. Surely in 12/8 it should follow the same pattern. I have Quantisation setting set to allow dotted rests in compound time, so the issue isn't the dotted rests. Does anyone know of another setting I might be missing?
Thanks in advance,
Gareth
There's a test file attached; it seems to be out-of-the-box default behaviour. I open a default document, change the time signature to 12/8 and enter a dotted quarter. I skip to the next measure. Auto-fill With Rests kicks in, and I am left with dotted-half rest followed by dotted-quarter rest. Surely this is incorrect? In 4/4, the default would be quarter-note, followed by quarter-rest, then half-rest. Surely in 12/8 it should follow the same pattern. I have Quantisation setting set to allow dotted rests in compound time, so the issue isn't the dotted rests. Does anyone know of another setting I might be missing?
Thanks in advance,
Gareth
- Attachments
-
- 12_8_test.musx
- (100.6 KiB) Downloaded 114 times
Gareth J. Green
FIn26
Win10
FIn26
Win10
- Peter Thomsen
- Posts: 6626
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 6:47 pm
- Finale Version: Finale v27.4
- Operating System: Mac
If I Recall Correctly, this issue has been discussed before.
Obviously the dotted quarter rest should be first.
Fortunately we do not get this incorrect rest order in 4/4.
Obviously the dotted quarter rest should be first.
Fortunately we do not get this incorrect rest order in 4/4.
Mac OS X 12.6.9 (Monterey), Finale user since 1996
-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:27 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 26.2
- Operating System: Windows
Further investigation reveals that I can't even manually correct one measure and paste to another; the target measure reverts to the incorrect order. This is going to be a nightmare in my current project.
Gareth J. Green
FIn26
Win10
FIn26
Win10
- John Ruggero
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:41 am
- Finale Version: Finale 25.5
- Operating System: Mac
Same strange behavior here. Maybe input a dotted quarter note and then a dotted quarter rest each time the situation occurs?
2020 M1 Mac mini (OS 12.6) Finale 25.5, Dorico, Affinity Publisher, SmartScore 64 Pro, JW Plug-ins, TG Tools, Keyboard Maestro
www.cantilenapress.com
"The better the composer, the better the notation."
www.cantilenapress.com
"The better the composer, the better the notation."
- Peter Thomsen
- Posts: 6626
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 6:47 pm
- Finale Version: Finale v27.4
- Operating System: Mac
Let me guess:Gareth Green wrote: ↑Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:18 amFurther investigation reveals that I can't even manually correct one measure and paste to another; the target measure reverts to the incorrect order …
1) Your document is a multi-staff document (like e. g. a string quartet), not a one-staff document (like a flute solo) - right?
2) You are copying one measure of a single staff - right?
3) You are not making a Stack Selection of that single staff - right?
At first it seems impossible to make a Stack Selection of a single staff in a multi-staff document.
The secret is that you should switch to Scroll View (if you are not there already), and program a Staff Set of only that single staff.
When you are viewing the Staff Set, you can make a Stack Selection of that single staff.
With a Stack Selection you can copy the measure - and Finale will not “re-calculate” the rests.
Mac OS X 12.6.9 (Monterey), Finale user since 1996
-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:27 pm
- Finale Version: Finale 26.2
- Operating System: Windows
Thanks Peter, that may be the solution; I'll experiment.
Gareth J. Green
FIn26
Win10
FIn26
Win10
-
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:34 am
- Finale Version: Finale 26, 27.4.1
- Operating System: Windows
If I insert the correct rests manually and then copy the rests only, they stay put. (I use v26.)
Also if I copy the whole measure with correct rests, these are not changed - but I guess you would need to have different notes on the first beat in different places. A workaround could be to copy whole measures with the same rhythmic pattern and then change the first dotted quarter with return/enter (in Speedy).
Also if I copy the whole measure with correct rests, these are not changed - but I guess you would need to have different notes on the first beat in different places. A workaround could be to copy whole measures with the same rhythmic pattern and then change the first dotted quarter with return/enter (in Speedy).
Finale 26.3, 27.4.1
Windows 10
Windows 10
- Peter Thomsen
- Posts: 6626
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 6:47 pm
- Finale Version: Finale v27.4
- Operating System: Mac
Let me guess:Anders Hedelin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 01, 2020 2:33 pmIf I insert the correct rests manually and then copy the rests only, they stay put. (I use v26.)
Also if I copy the whole measure with correct rests, these are not changed …
You are talking about the one-staff test document Gareth Green attached to the first post - right?
The copying problem (= Finale re-calculating the rests) happens when the selection is not a Stack Selection.
E. g. in a multi-staff document where you select only a single staff.
See my previous post for a full description.
Mac OS X 12.6.9 (Monterey), Finale user since 1996
-
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:34 am
- Finale Version: Finale 26, 27.4.1
- Operating System: Windows
Ok, I see your point, Peter. Thanks for the enlightenment.
I am familiar with the stack selection workaround. I think it was you who tipped me off on that one, once.
I am familiar with the stack selection workaround. I think it was you who tipped me off on that one, once.
Finale 26.3, 27.4.1
Windows 10
Windows 10
- motet
- Posts: 8292
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
- Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
- Operating System: Windows
In terms of copying, the rests copy correctly whether I make a stack selection or not, and whether the "allow dotted rests" options are checked or not. What am I not understanding?
- Attachments
-
- 0559.png (46.57 KiB) Viewed 3384 times
- David Ward
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:48 pm
- Finale Version: F 25.5 & 26.3
- Operating System: Mac
This has been annoying me for years. I use 12/8 and 9/8 (which had an equivalent error, I'm not sure whether it's still there) frequently and have learnt to put up with it (but should probably take the trouble to complain, complain and complain again and again to MM).
Motet, I think the copying error may now be Mac only. I'm certainly encountering it every time I copy and paste right now in my current project if the dotted crotched was not entered from scratch manually, rather than corrected after the event in the source bar.
Motet, I think the copying error may now be Mac only. I'm certainly encountering it every time I copy and paste right now in my current project if the dotted crotched was not entered from scratch manually, rather than corrected after the event in the source bar.
Finale 25.5 & 26.3
Mac 10.13.6 & 10.14.6
Mac 10.13.6 & 10.14.6
- motet
- Posts: 8292
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:33 pm
- Finale Version: 2014.5,2011,2005,27
- Operating System: Windows
"Fill with rests" is wrong for me, but not copying, but I could well be misunderstanding Gareth's issue.
In 9/8, if you have "allow dotted rests in compound meter", "fill with rests" pads a dotted crotchet note with a dotted minim rest, which is wrong, I think (you'd want two dotted crotchet rests, or crotchet-quaver-crotchet-quaver). So a dotted minim rest at the end of the bar should occur in 12/8 but not 9/8.
In 9/8, if you have "allow dotted rests in compound meter", "fill with rests" pads a dotted crotchet note with a dotted minim rest, which is wrong, I think (you'd want two dotted crotchet rests, or crotchet-quaver-crotchet-quaver). So a dotted minim rest at the end of the bar should occur in 12/8 but not 9/8.
-
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:34 am
- Finale Version: Finale 26, 27.4.1
- Operating System: Windows
This is mysteriouser and mysteriouser.
What I get when copying rests only - without stack selection - is: - and when copying whole measures, still without stack selection: The same happens when I copy horizontally, to the following measure. I recently trashed the preferences, so the 'fill with rests at the end of the measure' is on (I usually turn it off). Probably it doesn't affect this.
What I get when copying rests only - without stack selection - is: - and when copying whole measures, still without stack selection: The same happens when I copy horizontally, to the following measure. I recently trashed the preferences, so the 'fill with rests at the end of the measure' is on (I usually turn it off). Probably it doesn't affect this.
We seem to have experienced the same thing then.
Finale 26.3, 27.4.1
Windows 10
Windows 10
-
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:34 am
- Finale Version: Finale 26, 27.4.1
- Operating System: Windows
Just to clarify, if needed:
The stack selection method is necessary when copying the following 'invented' rhythm (a tip I myself got from Peter): - otherwise Finale would 'correct' it to: In other words, this seems not to apply to the straightforward rhythm of the OP.
The stack selection method is necessary when copying the following 'invented' rhythm (a tip I myself got from Peter): - otherwise Finale would 'correct' it to: In other words, this seems not to apply to the straightforward rhythm of the OP.
Finale 26.3, 27.4.1
Windows 10
Windows 10