Finale Forum Store | Buy Sheet Music

Newzik vs. Forscore

General notation questions, including advanced notation, formatting, etc., go here.

Moderators: miker, Peter Thomsen

Newzik vs. Forscore

Postby thankfuldawg » Sun May 13, 2018 8:55 pm

I’ve been using ForScore for my Finale files on my iPad Pro and it is an amazing organizer/reader. Someone mentioned a newer app called Newzik...does anyone have experience with Newzik and have an opinion on how it compares to ForScore?

Thanks, Ed
thankfuldawg
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 5:31 am
Finale Version: Finale 25.2
Operating System: Mac

Re: Newzik vs. Forscore

by Sponsor

Forum Sponsor
 

Re: Newzik vs. Forscore

Postby Bill Reed » Mon May 14, 2018 11:49 am

Finale 25, Overture 5, Sibelius 8, Notion 6, Cubase 8.5
Win10 x64, 32GB RAM, Focusrite Scarlett 18i20
Kontakt, VSL VI Pro, VE Pro, EWQL Orch, Choirs and Pianos
August Foster 190
Bill Reed
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 7:24 pm
Location: Berkshires, MA
Finale Version: 25.2
Operating System: Windows

Re: Newzik vs. Forscore

Postby BuonTempi » Sun May 20, 2018 9:39 am

The trouble with notation readers that render the notation themselves is that you lose control over the layout. Things like page turns at helpful places; particular fonts for text and symbols; etc, etc.

ForScore has been the early market leader: any new reader has got to convince people to switch, with significant new features.
User avatar
BuonTempi
 
Posts: 677
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:59 am
Finale Version: Finale 25
Operating System: Mac

Re: Newzik vs. Forscore

Postby michelp » Sun May 20, 2018 8:37 pm

At first sight, Newzik is improving on a regular basis. If I understood correctly, Newzik has its strengths : it can import and display not only pdf files, but also MusicXML files, and then transpose them, extract parts from a score, play individual staves, sync any audio to the score. Worth keeping an eye on it...
Michel
MacOsX 10.11.6, Finale 25.5, 2014.5, Mac Mini Intel Dual Core i7 3Ghz, 16 Go Ram. Azerty kb. Full TGTools. MOTU Midi Express XT USB, Roland Sound Canvas SC-88vl, MOTU Audio Express. 2 monitors (27' pivot, 24')
User avatar
michelp
 
Posts: 1529
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 3:35 pm
Location: Belgium
Finale Version: 25.5, 2014.5
Operating System: Mac

Re: Newzik vs. Forscore

Postby MD123 » Sun Jan 13, 2019 7:02 am

I purchased them both. I am a conductor and after trying them for a while saw that personally Newzik worked better for my need.
- Organization wise their library is super comfortable being able to create setlists for concerts or educational purposes.
- It allows me to share my annotations in real time with my colleagues using the "Collaborative setlist"
- For orchestras it offers a whole solution of how to replace the old paper library into a digital one.
- I can import MusicXML

Forscore has more features but while having a massive amount of scores I got lost with their organization system. Newzik's Library, the Collaborative Setlist, orchestra solution and musicxml is a winner for me.
MD123
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 3:14 pm
Finale Version: Finale 2014
Operating System: Mac

Re: Newzik vs. Forscore

Postby Bill Stevens » Sun Jan 13, 2019 5:01 pm

Church was canceled this morning (it doesn't take much snow in North Carolina) so I bought Newzik and spent the morning learning about it.

As MD123 wrote, Forscore has more features, but that results in Newzik being easier to navigate.

As PDF readers there is not much difference, other than ease of navigation. The big difference is going to be in importing XML's which allows much flexibility in which staves of a score show, and modifying parts; for instance, adding the voice part to the flute part or something like that.

I don't know anyone else who has Newzik so I wasn't able to experiment with the collaborative mode, but I expect this will be the main selling point. It allows annotations on one device to show up on all devices linked to the set list through Wi-Fi.

I did note that Newzik can download from Google Docs and my understanding is that this will not be possible in upcoming versions of Forscore, though I may be wrong about that.

For my purposes -- studying scores and taking my scores to rehearsals or into the recording studio -- there is not much difference between the two so I will probably use both interchangeably. It will be interesting to see what happens with Newzik and how Forscore improves in future versions.

Bill
Finale user since the beginning.
Bill Stevens
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 1:37 pm
Location: North Carolina
Finale Version: 26
Operating System: Mac

Re: Newzik vs. Forscore

Postby miker » Sun Jan 13, 2019 5:28 pm

Newzik is definitely one to watch. Its major advantages would seem to be the XML use, and the collaborative aspects. Admittedly, the second doesn’t do much for me, but I can certainly see its use in a group. XML, on the other hand, could be quite useful.

I may drop the coins, and check it out for real!
Finale 26 | SmartScorePro X2
Mac OS 10.13 High Sierra
Copyist for Barbershop Harmony Society
User avatar
miker
 
Posts: 4520
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:28 pm
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Finale Version: Finale 26
Operating System: Mac

Re: Newzik vs. Forscore

Postby Bill Reed » Sun Jan 13, 2019 10:12 pm

Finale 25, Overture 5, Sibelius 8, Notion 6, Cubase 8.5
Win10 x64, 32GB RAM, Focusrite Scarlett 18i20
Kontakt, VSL VI Pro, VE Pro, EWQL Orch, Choirs and Pianos
August Foster 190
Bill Reed
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 7:24 pm
Location: Berkshires, MA
Finale Version: 25.2
Operating System: Windows


Return to General Finale Help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], musikai and 5 guests


Music Engravers and Music Copyists
   Finale - Sibelius - Cakewalk - Archives - Finale Books - Contact


Copyright © 1994 - 2019 by C.M. Press, LLC